Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Sublingual Immunotherapy as an Alternative to Induce Protection Against Acute Respiratory Infections
Published on: August 30, 2014
Sublingual and buccal allergen delivery: Targeting oral dendritic cells for allergen-specific immunotherapy
Sublingual and buccal routes offer unique advantages for local and systemic drug delivery. Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) requires repeated injections of allergens and carries a high risk of adverse effects, whereas sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) offers a safer, noninvasive, needle-free alternative for allergy treatment. However, compared with SCIT, SLIT typically requires 50-100 times higher allergen doses to achieve clinical effectiveness during allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT), primarily because of the absence of adjuvants or specialized delivery systems. Promoting the availability of aeroallergens and food allergens to oral dendritic cells (DCs) may increase the effectiveness of AIT while reducing the required doses. Such allergen presentation platforms include adjuvants that stimulate Th1 and/or regulatory T-cell responses. Another strategy involves allergen encapsulation or adsorption into nanoparticulates or mucoadhesive systems to increase allergen availability and target oral DCs. This review examines the physiological factors influencing sublingual/buccal allergen delivery, therapeutic mechanisms and clinical development of approved formulations. Furthermore, we categorize and describe natural or synthetic products used as adjuvants or delivery systems that could be considered as candidate allergen presentation platforms for sublingual and buccal administration.
Sublingual and buccal routes offer unique advantages for local and systemic drug delivery. Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) requires repeated injections of allergens and carries a high risk of adverse effects, whereas sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) offers a safer, noninvasive, needle-free alternative for allergy treatment. However, compared with SCIT, SLIT typically requires 50-100 times higher allergen doses to achieve clinical effectiveness during allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT), primarily because of the absence of adjuvants or specialized delivery systems. Promoting the availability of aeroallergens and food allergens to oral dendritic cells (DCs) may increase the effectiveness of AIT while reducing the required doses. Such allergen presentation platforms include adjuvants that stimulate Th1 and/or regulatory T-cell responses. Another strategy involves allergen encapsulation or adsorption into nanoparticulates or mucoadhesive systems to increase allergen availability and target oral DCs. This review examines the physiological factors influencing sublingual/buccal allergen delivery, therapeutic mechanisms and clinical development of approved formulations. Furthermore, we categorize and describe natural or synthetic products used as adjuvants or delivery systems that could be considered as candidate allergen presentation platforms for sublingual and buccal administration.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Delivery: Miscellaneous Routes
Oral inhalation and nasal sprays swiftly transfer drugs across the respiratory epithelium's mucosal layer. Inhaled glucocorticoids and bronchodilators directly target lung conditions such as asthma, while fluticasone nasal spray mitigates allergic rhinitis.
Transdermal patches transport drugs...
Drug Delivery: Enteral Route
Allergic Reactions
Antiasthma Drugs: Mast Cell Stabilizers and Anti-IgE Drugs
Mast cell stabilizers, such as cromolyn (also known as sodium cromoglycate) and nedocromil (Tilade), are effective drugs in asthma management. These stabilizers hinder histamine release by skillfully obstructing the activation of mast cells and other cellular entities. Notably, they navigate this task without...

