Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

A Training and Testing System for Performing Vascular Reconstruction In Vitro
Published on: October 26, 2019
Wear, fracture strength, and reliability of three-unit definitive fixed dental prostheses fabricated with different
Betül Arslan Acicbe1, Sevda Deniz1, Mustafa Borga Dönmez2
1Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Biruni University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Objectives:
To compare the wear, fracture strength, and reliability of definitive resin three-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) additively manufactured (AM) with different technologies to those subtractively manufactured (SM) from a high-impact polymer composite (HIPC).
Methods:
Thirty-two three-unit posterior FDPs (1-mm chamfer finish line, connector cross-sectional area: 16 mm2, minimum occlusal thickness: 1 mm, cement space: 100 µm) were either AM from a resin for definitive use (VarseoSmile Triniq) using digital light processing (AM-DLP), low force display (AM-LFD), or liquid crystal display (AM-LCD) technologies, or SM from a HIPC (SM-HIPC) (n = 8). All FDPs replaced the right second premolar. All FDPs were scanned before and after thermomechanical aging and subjected to load-to-fracture testing. Pre- and post-aging scans were digitally assessed for maximum wear depth and volume loss. Wear and fracture data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests, while chi-squared tests were used to evaluate Weibull parameters (α = 0.05).
Results:
Mean fracture loads ranged from 1013 to 2725 N, while mean characteristic strength values ranged from 1072 to 2895 N. SM-HIPC mostly had lower wear (P ≤ 0.018), and AM-DLP had lower volume loss than AM-LFD and AM-LCD (P < 0.001). SM-HIPC showed the highest fracture load and characteristic strength, while AM-LFD had higher fracture load and characteristic strength than AM-LCD (P ≤ 0.001).
Conclusions:
SM-HIPC demonstrated better wear resistance along with the highest fracture and characteristic strength. Among AM FDPs, AM-DLP showed the lowest volume loss, while AM-LFD withstood higher loads and exhibited greater characteristic strength than AM-LCD.
Clinical Significance:
Three-unit FDPs fabricated with tested AM resin and digital light processing or low force display technologies may be suitable alternatives to those in high-impact polymer composite considering the reported masticatory forces of the molar region (1110 N). Nevertheless, they might also be more prone to complications related to wear.
More Related Videos
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
03:02Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins
Published on: January 17, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Bonding and Strength of Aggregate
Tensile Strength Considerations of Concrete
The dimensions and shape of a concrete specimen also...
Behavior of Concrete Under Compressive Load
As the concrete specimen fractures under...