Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Maternal and child healthcare coverage and trends: refugee vs. non-refugee districts in Uganda
Rogers Nsubuga1,2, Rornald Muhumuza Kananura3,4, Ronald Wasswa3
1Center of Excellence for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health, Department of Health Policy Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda. rnsubuga@idi.co.ug.
Background:
Uganda hosts the largest refugee population in Africa, which exerts much pressure on the district health systems. While refugee-hosting districts (RH) receive targeted investments, the extent to which these influence maternal and child health (MCH) service coverage remains unclear. Using routine facility data, we examined differences in MCH coverage and trends between RH and non-refugee-hosting (non-RH) districts and also explored the effects of government health financing and health system performance on MCH coverage.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective analysis utilizing routine health facility MCH data from the Uganda District Health Information System and district-level government Primary Healthcare (PHC) expenditure data from 2020 to 2023. MCH indicators were ANC1st trimester, ANC4, Institutional deliveries, mothers' Post-natal care (PNC), Measles1 and DPT3 vaccination. We computed a composite coverage index (CCI), health systems performance z-score and compared trends across RH and non-RH districts. Mixed Effects Models assessed the association between government expenditure, RH-status, health system performance over the years.
Results:
RH districts consistently had modestly higher coverage of ANC1st trimester, ANC4, Institutional deliveries, PNC, Measles vaccination and CCI trends. Government expenditure was significantly higher in RH districts and refugee-dominant (RD) districts (p < 0.001 vs. p = 0.007). Refugee-dominant districts had higher but non-significant MCH coverage. Unadjusted models of MCH indicators and CCI were positively influenced by government financing and health systems performance z-score except for DPT3 and Measles, respectively. Adjusted models revealed that ANC4 coverage was 7.4% points higher in RH districts (7.42; 95% CI:0.753, 14.090; p = 0.029) and increased by 3.6% points for every unit increase in z-score (3.60; 95% CI: 0.729, 6.462; p = 0.014). CCI increased by 1.6% points and 2.3% points for every unit increased in the government expenditure and z-score respectively (1.55; 95% CI: 0.310, 2.788; p = 0.014) vs. (2.31; 95% CI: 0.642, 3.975; p = 0.007).
Conclusion:
Novel approach - leveraging routine facility data, revealed MCH coverage was modestly consistently higher in RH districts over the years and RH status influenced ANC4 coverage. Overall district-CCI depended on Government investment and health systems performance implying increase in PHC financing could be a key driver to universal district-level improvement.
Related Concept Videos
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Current Trends in Nursing II
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Preventive Healthcare Services

