Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients
Published on: March 1, 2024
Diagnostic concordance of dermatopathology and PCR in differentiating eczema from psoriasis
Andrea Schmitt1, Susanne Proksch2, Ludwig Gutzweiler2
1Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Background:
Targeted treatments for non-communicable chronic inflammatory skin diseases like eczema and psoriasis offer significant potential for effective therapy. However, therapeutic success requires an accurate diagnosis, which is challenging due to their overlapping clinical and histological features.
Objectives:
We aimed at assessing the diagnostic performance of both a manual (MC) and fully automated (PsorX-LabDisk) quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) test based on the expression of NOS2 and CCL27 compared with conventional dermatopathological evaluation in differentiating psoriasis from eczema.
Methods:
Seventy-three formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded skin samples of psoriasis and eczema were randomly selected and evaluated histopathologically (H&E-stained sections) by 14 dermatopathologists to assess inter-observer variability, quantified using Cohen's and Fleiss' κ. To confirm that the observed variability was not cohort- or rater-specific, a validation cohort (n = 72) from an independent institution was assessed by three dermatopathologists under identical conditions. For molecular analysis, both manual (MC) and automated NOS2/CCL27-based RT-qPCR (PsorX-LabDisk) workflows were applied. Diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy) of histopathological and molecular analyses was determined against reference diagnoses.
Results:
Dermatopathological evaluation demonstrated only fair agreement (Fleiss' κ = 0.31) in both study and validation cohort. The mean diagnostic accuracy of dermatopathology was 76.9%, with a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 81.6%. In comparison, MC and the PsorX-LabDisk achieved sensitivities of both 92.9%, specificities of 82.2% and 84.4% and accuracies of 87.7% and 86.3%, respectively. In diagnostically ambiguous cases, molecular testing maintained high accuracy (>86%), clearly outperforming dermatopathology, which showed near-random agreement and low accuracy (61.7%).
Conclusions:
Both MC and PsorX-LabDisk provide a reliable, examiner-independent complement to dermatopathology for differentiating psoriasis and eczema. By reducing diagnostic ambiguity, it enhances clinical confidence and supports more precise and timely therapeutic decisions in inflammatory skin disease management.
Related Concept Videos
Differential Staining Technique
Methods of Classification and Identification

