Carotid Artery Stenting Outcomes in Comprehensive Stroke Hospitals (CASSH): A Prospective Multicenter Study

Mohamad Ezzeldin1, Ameer E Hassan2, Rime Ezzeldin3

  • 1HCA Houston Healthcare Kingwood, TX (M.E., V.C., L.M., Z.A.).

Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)
|March 12, 2026
PubMed

Insights

Carotid artery stenting by expert neurointerventionalists shows low complication rates. Patient selection and perioperative care are crucial for optimal outcomes in stroke prevention.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Interventional Neurology
  • Cardiovascular Medicine

Background:

  • The CASONI study indicated that neurointerventional surgeon experience reduces carotid artery stenting complications.
  • The CASSH study aims to validate and expand on CASONI findings in a real-world setting.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To prospectively evaluate real-world carotid artery stenting outcomes.
  • To assess outcomes performed by fellowship-trained neurointerventionalists at comprehensive stroke centers.

Main Methods:

  • A multicenter, prospective observational study involving 889 patients across 15 US comprehensive stroke centers.
  • Included adults with symptomatic (≥50%) or asymptomatic (≥70%) carotid stenosis.
  • Primary outcome: 30-day composite of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction; secondary outcomes included complications and mortality.

Main Results:

  • The 30-day composite primary outcome occurred in 1.2% of patients.
  • Access site complications (1.7%) and nonprocedural mortality (1.5%) were the most common secondary outcomes.
  • Higher preprocedural disability, stroke severity, and longer fluoroscopy times were associated with increased complication risk. Postprocedural antiplatelet therapy showed protective effects.

Conclusions:

  • Carotid artery stenting by fellowship-trained neurointerventionalists at comprehensive stroke centers is associated with low periprocedural event rates.
  • Outcomes align with the CREST-2 trial, especially in asymptomatic patients.
  • Preprocedural disability, stroke severity, age, and cardiac function significantly influence outcomes, highlighting the importance of patient selection and perioperative care.
Abstract