Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study
Published on: November 6, 2015
Functional Outcomes After Buddy Tape Immobilization in a Healthy Population
Peter Joo1, Jonathan Cui1, Max Modrak1
1Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Purpose:
Buddy taping is a simple, cheap, and common method of treatment for various hand conditions. Unlike static splinting, buddy taping allows for maintained range of motion during the period of treatment. This study aims to objectively measure the functional impact that buddy tape immobilization has on activities of daily living.
Methods:
Healthy volunteers completed a baseline typing assessment and Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Upper Extremity (PROMIS-UE) functional assessment. The participants then repeated the typing assessment and PROMIS-UE assessment while two of their fingers were buddy taped in all possible permutations (index to middle, middle to ring, ring to small) in both the dominant and nondominant hands. Volunteers acted as their own control group. Differences in overall average typing speed (words per minute [WPM]), accuracy, and PROMIS-UE scores were evaluated via one-way analysis of variance or two-sample t tests.
Results:
Twenty-seven healthy volunteers were recruited. There were statistically significant decreases in typing speed with all buddy tape configurations, ranging from 75.4 WPM to 44.8 WPM as well as accuracy ranging from 92.6% to 84.8%. The most affected taping configuration was buddy tape between the left middle and index fingers, and the least affected taping configuration was buddy tape between the right-small and -ring fingers. There were no statistically significant differences in PROMIS-UE scores for any buddy taping configuration.
Conclusions:
This study demonstrates that buddy taping alone significantly decreases typing speed and accuracy, particularly when the left index and middle fingers are immobilized, though overall self-reported function remains unaffected. These findings provide objective, quantifiable measurements of disability and can help provide clear expectations to patients, employers, or insurers regarding the temporary limitations imposed by buddy taping.
Level Of Evidence:
III, nonconsecutive cohort study.
More Related Videos
05:07Author Spotlight: Implementing the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Concept in Rehabilitation Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Published on: March 1, 2024
06:28Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
Published on: December 13, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Handwashing III: During the Procedure and Post-Procedure Steps
Holter Monitor: 24-Hour Monitoring