Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care01:27

Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) is characterized by narrowed arteries that diminish blood flow to the extremities. Effective management of PAD requires an interprofessional approach involving various healthcare professionals. The critical aspects of interprofessional care for PAD patients focus on risk factor modification, drug therapy, exercise therapy, nutrition therapy, critical limb ischemia care, and interventional radiology and surgical procedures.The primary treatment goal for PAD...
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management01:23

Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management

During the postoperative period, it is crucial to focus on maintaining circulation, identifying and managing potential complications, and planning for discharge.Nursing AssessmentVital signs monitoring: Regularly monitor vital signs, including blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and temperature, to detect early signs of complications such as bleeding and infection.Circulation assessment: Monitor pulses, perform Doppler assessments, and check capillary refill, color, temperature, and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Outcomes After Treatment of Scaphoid Nonunion With Open Reduction Internal Fixation and Nonvascularized Autograft.

The Journal of hand surgery·2026
Same author

Resident Participation in Operative Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: A Comparison of Outcomes.

Journal of hand surgery global online·2026
Same author

Characterization of Trimmed Nerve Morphology Using High-Resolution Imaging: Comparison of Three Surgical Instruments.

Journal of hand surgery global online·2026
Same author

Amyloidosis and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: An Update on Diagnostic and Management Considerations.

Journal of hand surgery global online·2026
Same author

Achilles Allograft in the Upper Extremity: A Systematic Review.

Journal of hand surgery global online·2026
Same author

Biomechanics of a Scapholunate Bridge Augmentation Technique Using All-Suture, Knotless Anchors.

The Journal of hand surgery·2026
Same journal

Current Concepts in Perioperative Guidance and Outcomes in Hand Surgery Patients Taking Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists.

The Journal of hand surgery·2026
Same journal

Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Combined With 3-Dimensional Hyaluronan-Based Scaffold Promote Tendon-to-Bone Tunnel Healing.

The Journal of hand surgery·2026
Same journal

The Diagnosis and Management of Clenched Fist Syndrome.

The Journal of hand surgery·2026
Same journal

Ultrasound-Assisted Thin Posteromedial Thigh Free Flap for Coverage of Hand and Upper-Extremity Wounds.

The Journal of hand surgery·2026
Same journal

Comparison of One- and Two-knot Techniques in Eight-Strand Flexor Tendon Repair Using Looped Sutures: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Model.

The Journal of hand surgery·2026
Same journal

Biomechanical Comparison of Metal Versus Suture and Screw Tension Band Technique for Olecranon Fractures.

The Journal of hand surgery·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
10:10

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Published on: July 5, 2011

44.2K

Peer Review in Upper-Extremity Surgery: Essential Strategies for Reviewers.

Rafa Rahman1, Louis C Grandizio2, Eitan Melamed3

  • 1HSS Education Institute, New York, NY.

The Journal of Hand Surgery
|March 12, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review explores the history and future of peer review in hand and upper-extremity surgery. It offers practical guidance for reviewers to enhance manuscript quality and address common errors.

Keywords:
Academic misconductjournal publicationpeer reviewresearchscholarship

More Related Videos

An Anatomical Study of Nerves at Risk During Minimally Invasive Hallux Valgus Surgery
15:04

An Anatomical Study of Nerves at Risk During Minimally Invasive Hallux Valgus Surgery

Published on: February 17, 2018

13.0K
Therapy Interventions for Upper Limb Amputees Undergoing Selective Nerve Transfers
07:59

Therapy Interventions for Upper Limb Amputees Undergoing Selective Nerve Transfers

Published on: October 29, 2021

4.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
10:10

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Published on: July 5, 2011

44.2K
An Anatomical Study of Nerves at Risk During Minimally Invasive Hallux Valgus Surgery
15:04

An Anatomical Study of Nerves at Risk During Minimally Invasive Hallux Valgus Surgery

Published on: February 17, 2018

13.0K
Therapy Interventions for Upper Limb Amputees Undergoing Selective Nerve Transfers
07:59

Therapy Interventions for Upper Limb Amputees Undergoing Selective Nerve Transfers

Published on: October 29, 2021

4.3K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Hand Surgery
  • Medical Publishing

Background:

  • The peer-review process is crucial for scientific integrity in hand and upper-extremity surgery.
  • Ensuring high-quality manuscript reviews is essential for advancing the field.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the historical evolution and future trajectory of peer review in hand and upper-extremity surgery.
  • To provide a practical guide for manuscript reviewers, enhancing their skills and effectiveness.
  • To identify and address common methodological errors in surgical manuscripts.

Main Methods:

  • Landscape review of the peer-review process in hand and upper-extremity surgery.
  • Analysis of prereview considerations including content, statistical expertise, bias, and conflicts of interest.
  • Identification of common errors across different manuscript sections.

Main Results:

  • The review synthesizes current practices and future trends in hand surgery peer review.
  • Strategies for improving review quality, including bias detection and statistical assessment, are presented.
  • Common pitfalls in manuscript preparation and review are highlighted.

Conclusions:

  • Effective peer review is vital for maintaining the quality of research in hand and upper-extremity surgery.
  • This guide equips reviewers with tools to improve manuscript assessment.
  • Addressing methodological errors proactively will elevate the standard of published surgical literature.