Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
Published on: February 19, 2021
Volumetric Postcontrast T1 Turbo Spin-Echo versus Gradient-Recalled Echo MR sequences for Detecting Brain Metastases:
Anass Benomar1, Sukhmanjit S Ghumman2, Youcef Ouahdi2
1From the Department of Medical Imaging (A.B., S.S., C.H., P.J.M.), Radiation Oncology (H.S., K.L.Z., C.-L.T., J.D., H.C., D.D.,A.S.), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiology (S. S.G.), Jewish General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Faculty of Medicine (Y.O.), University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Departments of Radiology and Neurologic Surgery (S.G.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA and Department of Radiology (Q.F.), Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. anass.benomar@umontreal.ca.
Background:
Contrast-enhanced 3D T1-weighted MRI is the imaging reference for detection and follow-up of brain metastases. Volumetric GRE-based sequences, such as MPRAGE, are widely used but remain prone to susceptibility and lower lesion conspicuity. 3D black-blood TSE-based sequences, such as Sampling Perfection with Application-Optimized Contrasts by using different flip angle Evolutions (SPACE), have been increasingly embedded into routine workflow and are thought to improve lesion detection in part through vessel signal suppression.
Purpose:
We aimed to investigate the comparative diagnostic performance of 3D T1 TSE versus GRE sequences for the detection of brain metastases.
Data Sources:
Studies comparing the diagnostic performance of postcontrast 3D T1 SE and GRE sequences in adults with brain metastases were searched on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, Google Scholar, and PROSPERO, from inception through April 2025.
Study Selection:
Fifteen studies encompassing 544 patients with 4338 metastases were included.
Data Analysis:
Data on diagnostic accuracy parameters, image quality, and inter-rater agreement were extracted. Random-effects models were applied to compute pooled sensitivity and comparative OR for lesion detection. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2 and QUADAS-C tools.
Data Synthesis:
Pooled sensitivities for detection of brain metastases were 97.4% (95%CI, 93.2%-99.0%) for TSE and 76.1% (95%CI, 69.3-81.9) for GRE-based sequences, with a comparative OR of 12.0 (95%CI, 5.45-26.6, P <.0001). Detectability of small lesions (<5 mm) was significantly better on TSE (96.1%; 95%CI, 87.7-98.8) than GRE (58.4%; 95%CI, 47.9-68.2), while both techniques performed comparably for larger (≥5 mm) lesions (98.2% for TSE, 94.4% for GRE). OR estimates were 17.2 (95%CI, 4.50-66.1) for small and 2.81 (95%CI, 0.92-8.56) for large lesions. Contrast-to-noise-ratio and inter-rater agreements were slightly higher on TSE than GRE. False positives were more common with TSE, mostly related to incomplete vessel suppression (49 FP counts in TSE, 35 in GRE).
Limitations:
Our meta-analysis is limited by high heterogeneity, case-only studies, possible small-study effects, and high risk of bias for the reference standard domain.
Conclusions:
Postcontrast 3D T1 TSE sequences provide higher sensitivity and improved lesion conspicuity compared with GRE sequence, particularly for small metastases, though at the cost of slightly higher false positives.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...

