Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

A Protocol to Set Up Needle-Free Connector with Positive Displacement on Central Venous Catheter in Intensive Care Unit
Published on: July 13, 2019
Comparative efficacy of low-concentration trisodium citrate and low-concentration heparin for locking central venous
Pattharawin Pattharanitima1, Kwansuphang Wongwatanasanti1, Pichaya Tantiyavarong1,2
1Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Insights
Low-concentration trisodium citrate (TSC) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) are effective catheter-locking anticoagulants for hemodialysis central venous catheters (CVCs). Both agents showed comparable safety and efficacy, with a potential reduction in infections for TSC in specific catheter types.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology and Urology
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Central venous catheters (CVCs) are crucial for hemodialysis when fistulas or grafts are not viable.
- Catheter-locking anticoagulants (CLAs), including trisodium citrate (TSC) and unfractionated heparin (UFH), prevent dysfunction but comparative low-concentration data are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-concentration 5% TSC versus 1000 U/mL UFH as CLAs in hemodialysis CVCs.
- To compare rates of catheter dysfunction (CD), bloodstream infections (CRBSI), exit site infections (ESI), bleeding, and mortality.
Main Methods:
- Randomized controlled trial involving 204 hemodialysis patients randomized to receive either 5% TSC or 1000 U/mL UFH as CLAs.
- Primary outcome: Catheter dysfunction (CD) rate at 180 days.
- Secondary outcomes: CRBSI, ESI, bleeding events, and mortality.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in CD rates between TSC (1.11/1000 catheter-days) and UFH (1.73/1000 catheter-days) (IRR 1.55, p=0.23).
- Comparable rates of CRBSI, ESI, bleeding, and mortality were observed between the two groups.
- In tunneled cuffed catheters (TCC), ESI rates were higher with UFH, though CD rates remained similar.
Conclusions:
- Both 5% TSC and 1000 U/mL UFH are effective and safe CLAs for hemodialysis CVCs.
- A potential benefit of reduced infectious complications with 5% TSC was noted in the TCC subgroup.
Abstract:
Central venous catheters (CVCs) are used in hemodialysis patients when arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) or grafts (AVGs) are not feasible. Catheter-locking anticoagulants (CLAs), such as low-concentration trisodium citrate (TSC) and unfractionated heparin (UFH), are used to prevent catheter dysfunction (CD), but comparative data on their safety and efficacy - especially at low concentration remain limited. This study evaluates the efficacy of low-concentration TSC versus low-concentration UFH as CLAs in hemodialysis CVCs. Patients undergoing hemodialysis were randomly allocated to receiving either 5% TSC or UFH 1000 U/mL as CLAs. The primary outcome was the CD rate. Secondary outcomes encompass catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), exit site infection (ESI), bleeding events, and mortality at 180 days. A total of 204 hemodialysis patients were randomized to receive either 5% trisodium citrate or 1,000 U/mL unfractionated heparin as catheter-locking anticoagulants. The CD rates at 180 days were 1.11 and 1.73 per 1,000 catheters-days for TSC and UFH, respectively, yielding an incidence rate ratio of 1.55 (95% CI: 0.72-3.45), p = 0.23. CRBSI and ESI were comparable in both groups. Bleeding and mortality were also not significantly different between the groups. In the sensitivity analysis of tunnel cuffed catheters (TCC), the rate of CD remained not significantly different between the groups; however, the rate of ESI was higher in the UFH group. Both 5% TSC and 1,000 U/mL UFH demonstrated comparable overall efficacy and safety as CLAs. A possible reduction in infectious complications with 5% TSC was observed only in the tunneled cuffed catheter subgroup.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

