Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

811
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
811

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Shaping the role of FDG PET in bladder cancer: current evidence and ongoing clinical trial.

The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of...·2026
Same author

External validation of the heidenreich criteria for patients with post-chemotherapy residual masses of non-seminomatous germ cell tumor.

The Canadian journal of urology·2026
Same author

Comparison of prostatic urethral lift (PUL) versus water vapour thermal therapy (WVTT): A focus on drug-free status and unplanned admissions.

BJUI compass·2026
Same author

The double-decker technique for transurethral water vapor therapy (Rezūm) in catheter-dependent patients: A step-by-step guide and results from a prospective registry.

Investigative and clinical urology·2026
Same author

Single twistable tendon-driven continuum robots.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Contemporary Prostate Cancer Intraprostatic Imaging Scores: A Practical and Hands-on Guide for Urologists.

European urology focus·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

986

Risk stratification and conditional recurrence after radical cystectomy: toward adaptive follow-up.

Roberto Contieri1, Alberto Martini2, Marc Furrer3,4

  • 1Department of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.

BJU International
|March 13, 2026
PubMed
Summary

A new model identifies high-risk bladder cancer patients after radical cystectomy (RC) using pathological T stage, node status, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). This allows for tailored follow-up schedules to improve patient outcomes.

Keywords:
Muscle invasive bladder cancerfollow‐upradical cystectomyrecurrencerisk stratification

More Related Videos

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
12:10

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Published on: May 19, 2022

9.7K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

11.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

986
Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
12:10

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Published on: May 19, 2022

9.7K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

11.0K

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Oncology
  • Data Science in Medicine

Background:

  • Radical cystectomy (RC) is a primary treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
  • Accurate risk stratification is crucial for optimizing post-operative follow-up (FU) and patient management.
  • Current FU strategies may not adequately differentiate risk levels, potentially leading to overtreatment or undertreatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a data-driven model for risk-stratifying patients post-RC.
  • To identify patients at high risk of recurrence following bladder cancer treatment.
  • To propose a risk-adapted follow-up schedule based on the developed model.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 3196 patients with cT2-T4 N0M0 bladder cancer undergoing RC across 16 European centers.
  • Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis incorporating pathological T stage, N stage, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI).
  • Landmark analysis to evaluate conditional risk of recurrence at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post-RC.

Main Results:

  • A high-risk group (pT3-4, node-positive, or pT2 with LVI) demonstrated significantly worse 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) (37.8% vs. 76.2%).
  • The model strongly predicted recurrence (HR 4.29), cancer-specific survival (sHR 5.80), and overall survival (HR 3.04).
  • Elevated recurrence risk persisted up to 4 years, with risk convergence observed after 5 years in event-free patients.

Conclusions:

  • A simple, pathology-based model (pT3-4/pN+/pT2+LVI) effectively stratifies patients after RC.
  • This model facilitates the implementation of a risk-adapted follow-up strategy.
  • Prospective validation is needed to confirm clinical utility, safety, and cost-effectiveness.