Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment
Published on: May 7, 2019
Confidence-Aware Pseudo-Label Self-Correction for Weakly Supervised Visual Grounding
This study introduces Confidence-aware Pseudo-label Learning (CPL) and CPL++ to improve weakly supervised visual grounding. These methods enhance region-query association by dynamically verifying and correcting suspicious links, outperforming existing techniques.
Area of Science:
- Computer Science
- Artificial Intelligence
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Weakly supervised visual grounding aims to connect text queries to image regions without direct training data.
- Existing methods struggle with overfitting due to unreliable cross-modal similarity scores for region proposal selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a robust framework for weakly supervised visual grounding that overcomes model overfitting.
- To improve the accuracy and reliability of associating text queries with image regions.
Main Methods:
- Proposed Confidence-aware Pseudo-label Learning (CPL) framework using uni-modal similarity for reliable pseudo-label generation.
- Introduced a cross-modal verification module using pre-trained vision-language models.
- Developed CPL++ with dynamic verification based on grounding loss and a self-supervised association correction module.
Main Results:
- Experimental results on five datasets demonstrate the superiority of the proposed approach.
- The CPL++ framework effectively mitigates error propagation by dynamically verifying and correcting suspicious associations.
- The methods show improved performance in weakly supervised visual grounding tasks.
Conclusions:
- The proposed CPL and CPL++ frameworks offer significant improvements in weakly supervised visual grounding.
- Dynamic verification and self-supervised correction are effective strategies for handling unreliable associations.
- The approach advances the state-of-the-art in visual grounding by addressing model overfitting and error propagation.
Related Concept Videos
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Perceptual Constancy
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...

