Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

11.3K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
11.3K
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.9K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.9K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.5K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.5K
Introduction to Epidemiology01:26

Introduction to Epidemiology

2.3K
Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
2.3K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

1.3K
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
1.3K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.5K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Unveiling the UHR threshold in American adult: a new biomarker for early diabetes detection from NHANES study.

BMC endocrine disorders·2025
Same author

Inflammatory Burden Index and One-Year Clinical Outcomes in Large Artery Atherosclerosis Ischemic Stroke: A Multicenter Prospective Study.

European journal of neurology·2025
Same author

Enhancing stroke-associated pneumonia prediction in ischemic stroke: An interpretable Bayesian network approach.

Digital health·2025
Same author

Machine Learning for Early Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After First Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Retrospective Cohort Study.

JMIR formative research·2024
Same author

The Association between Hypertension and Insomnia: A Bidirectional Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.

International journal of hypertension·2023
Same author

The Prevalence of Glaucoma and Its Related Factors in Rural Residents: A Cross-Sectional Study in Jiangxi, China.

Journal of ophthalmology·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 15, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.6K

Causal Discovery in Observational Medical Research: Scoping Review.

Zuting Liu1,2, Tian Luo1,2, Hailin Ma1,2

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.

JMIR Medical Informatics
|March 13, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning causal discovery algorithms are increasingly used in medical research, particularly in clinical and public health. However, challenges like confounding and small sample sizes persist, necessitating standardized validation and collaboration.

Keywords:
algorithmcausal discoverymedical researchobservational datascoping review

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 15, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.6K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.8K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Informatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Observational data is crucial for medical research but poses challenges for causal inference.
  • Machine learning (ML)-based causal discovery algorithms offer a promising approach to identify causal structures from observational data.
  • A gap exists in systematic performance assessments and practical guidance for applying these algorithms in medical research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically map and synthesize the application of causal discovery methods in observational medical research.
  • To detail the methodologies, application domains, robustness of findings, and practical challenges.
  • To provide insights for selecting and applying causal discovery algorithms in specific medical contexts.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidelines was conducted.
  • Searches included Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL up to May 2025.
  • Studies applying causal discovery algorithms to medical research (observational or synthetic data) were included; purely methodological or experimental studies were excluded.

Main Results:

  • Constraint-based algorithms, particularly fast causal inference and Peter-Clark, were most prevalent (52.8%).
  • Applications were concentrated in clinical research (75%), notably mental health and chronic diseases, with etiological research as a primary objective.
  • Common challenges included unmeasured confounding, limited sample sizes, and unvalidated assumptions, with innovations focusing on longitudinal data and multimodal integration.

Conclusions:

  • Causal discovery algorithms show growing application in medical research, but face challenges like lack of standardized validation and confounding.
  • Future efforts should prioritize developing evaluation standards for these algorithms.
  • Fostering interdisciplinary collaboration is essential to translate computational techniques into reliable medical research tools.