Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
Digital identity and the systemic vulnerability of peer review: A call for resilience, awareness, and shared
Matthias Dietzel1, Burak Kocak2, Pascal A T Baltzer3
1Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Germany.
Abstract:
Peer review remains the cornerstone of scientific quality assurance, yet its structural foundations have shifted substantially in the digital era. This editorial reflects on how increasing scale, globalisation, and reliance on digital identities have altered the way trust is constructed in contemporary scholarly publishing. Reviewer identities are now often defined by minimal, self-declared credentials that are difficult to verify systematically, creating structural vulnerabilities that are still rarely discussed explicitly in the scientific community. At the same time, traditional proxies for authenticity, such as review quality, are losing discriminatory power with the widespread availability of generative AI. These developments do not imply failure of peer review, but they open pathways for coordinated influence that may remain undetected. We argue that addressing these challenges is a matter of leadership and collective responsibility rather than technical quick fixes.
Related Concept Videos
Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth....
Deindividuation
Ethics in Research
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
