Differential Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Surgical Utilization by Procedure Type: Analysis of Korean National

Shin-Woong Ko1, Byeong Jin Ha1, Yu Deok Won1

  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, 153 Gyeongchun-ro, Guri 11923, Republic of Korea.

PubMed

Insights

The COVID-19 pandemic impacted surgical utilization differently across surgery types and regions in Korea. While cataract and spine surgeries increased, joint replacements declined, highlighting the need for tailored strategies during health crises.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Surgical Outcomes
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted global healthcare services.
  • The specific impact on surgical utilization, particularly across different surgery types and regions, requires detailed examination.
  • Understanding these variations is crucial for maintaining essential surgical care during public health emergencies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze trends in cataract, spine, and joint replacement surgeries in Korea from 2017-2021.
  • To evaluate the pandemic's effect on surgical utilization based on surgery type, urgency, and care setting.
  • To identify regional and institutional disparities in surgical access during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Korean National Health Insurance Service data (2017-2021).
  • Analyzed trends across 17 regions and 8 healthcare institution categories.
  • Employed interrupted time-series analysis to assess pandemic impact (2019-2021).

Main Results:

  • Cataract (+4.8%) and spine (+5.0%) surgeries increased in 2020, while joint replacements decreased (-2.9%).
  • Metropolitan areas demonstrated greater surgical utilization resilience compared to rural regions.
  • Elective procedures saw an increase, whereas semi-urgent procedures declined, with variations observed across institutional types.

Conclusions:

  • Surgical utilization patterns during the pandemic were diverse, influenced by surgery type, urgency, and regional factors.
  • Findings underscore the need for context-specific policies to prioritize and sustain surgical services during health crises.
  • Strategies are needed to ensure equitable access to essential surgical care across varied healthcare settings and geographic locations.