Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026

A Novel Arthroscopic Medial Knot-Tying Suture-Bridge Repair with Rip-Stop Technique for Rotator Cuff Tears
Published on: January 13, 2026
The Role of Tourniquet Use in Arthroscopic Meniscectomy: A Systematic Review
Cosmin Ioan Faur1,2,3, Dennis Cicio4, Andrea Pasquini5,6,7
1Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Abstract:
Background and Objectives: The role of tourniquet use in arthroscopic partial meniscectomy remains debatable. While traditionally adopted to enhance visualization and reduce intraoperative bleeding, concerns were raised regarding its impact on postoperative outcomes and potential adverse effects, such as muscle damage or delayed recovery. This systematic review aimed to evaluate whether the use of a tourniquet offers advantages in terms of surgical efficiency, patient recovery and complication rates in arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42025644740). A comprehensive literature search was performed in 5 databases including studies from the past 20 years. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing tourniquet-assisted versus non-tourniquet procedures in adolescent and adult patients undergoing isolated arthroscopic partial meniscectomy matched our inclusion criteria and the analysis was performed on those. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Data were synthesized either quantitatively or narratively, depending on the availability of statistical details. Results: Three RCTs with a total of 243 patients met the inclusion criteria. Operative time was shorter in tourniquet-assisted procedures in one study (p = 0.001), though comparable outcomes were achieved in non-tourniquet groups when pharmacological agents such as intra-articular adrenaline were used. No significant differences were observed between groups regarding postoperative pain (p = 0.22, p = 0.43), knee effusion (p = 0.96), range of motion (p = 0.91, p = 0.96), or time to return to functional activities (p = 0.9, p = 0.34, p = 0.23). Muscle damage, assessed by serum creatine phosphokinase CPK levels, did not differ between groups (p = 0.3, p = 0.093, p = 0.079). Intraoperative visibility and surgeon satisfaction rated higher in tourniquet groups (p = 0.002), although this was subjective and reported variably. No major tourniquet-related complications were recorded. Conclusions: The routine use of a tourniquet in arthroscopic partial meniscectomy provides limited intraoperative advantages and does not improve postoperative outcomes. Current evidence supports a selective rather than routine use of tourniquets, especially when pharmacological alternatives are available. Further high-quality studies are needed to define standardized protocols and assess long-term outcomes.
Insights
Tourniquet use in arthroscopic partial meniscectomy offers minimal intraoperative benefits and does not enhance patient recovery or reduce complications. Selective use is recommended over routine application, particularly with pharmacological alternatives available.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Sports Medicine
- Surgical Techniques
Background:
- The use of tourniquets in arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is debated due to potential impacts on recovery and adverse effects.
- Concerns exist regarding tourniquet-induced muscle damage and delayed patient recovery.
- This review assesses tourniquet benefits versus risks in arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the advantages of tourniquet use in arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.
- To compare surgical efficiency, patient recovery, and complication rates with and without tourniquets.
- To determine if tourniquets offer significant benefits in this procedure.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review adhering to PRISMA guidelines, registered in PROSPERO.
- Included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing tourniquet vs. non-tourniquet arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.
- Assessed methodological quality using Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool and synthesized data quantitatively/narratively.
Main Results:
- Three RCTs (243 patients) analyzed; operative time was shorter with tourniquets in one study.
- No significant differences in postoperative pain, effusion, range of motion, or return to function.
- Muscle damage (CPK levels) and tourniquet-related complications were not significantly different; visibility was higher with tourniquets.
Conclusions:
- Routine tourniquet use in arthroscopic partial meniscectomy offers limited intraoperative advantages and no improved postoperative outcomes.
- Selective tourniquet application is supported, especially when pharmacological agents are used.
- Further high-quality research is needed to establish standardized protocols and evaluate long-term results.

