Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Why BCF values from high test concentrations underestimate bioaccumulation - Reply to the comment by Ebert et al.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026

Same author

Valorization of birch tops and branches containing mechanically inseparable wood and bark.

Green chemistry : an international journal and green chemistry resource : GC·2026

Same author

Quantitative Spatial Analysis of PFAS in Nine Biological Tissues from Mouse via MALDI-TIMS-MSI.

Environmental science & technology·2026

Same author

Integrated Multi-Omics Reveals Synergistic Hepatotoxicity of Ethanol and PFOS Co-Exposure.

Chemico-biological interactions·2026

Same author

Structure-centric searching enables global mapping of the public metabolome.

Nature biotechnology·2026

Same author

Exploring the chemical profile of Greek honey varieties via Liquid Chromatography coupled to Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry and High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry: from metabolomic fingerprint to varietal discrimination.

Food chemistry·2026

Same journal

Correction: Chen et al. Chemical Composition of <i>Litsea pungens</i> Essential Oil and Its Potential Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities. <i>Molecules</i> 2023, <i>28</i>, 6835.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same journal

Correction: Ruan et al. Comparison of Extraction, Isolation, Purification, Structural Characterization and Immunomodulatory Activity of Polysaccharides from Two Species of <i>Cistanche</i>. <i>Molecules</i> 2025, <i>30</i>, 4754.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same journal

Correction: Li et al. Gastrodin Ameliorates Cognitive Dysfunction in Vascular Dementia Rats by Suppressing Ferroptosis via the Regulation of the Nrf2/Keap1-GPx4 Signaling Pathway. <i>Molecules</i> 2022, <i>27</i>, 6311.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same journal

Correction: Zueva et al. Steady-State Kinetics of Enzyme-Catalyzed Hydrolysis of Echothiophate, a P-S Bonded Organophosphorus as Monitored by Spectrofluorimetry. <i>Molecules</i> 2020, <i>25</i>, 1371.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same journal

1,4-Diazatriphenylene and Its Hetero-Fused Analogs: Synthesis and Applications.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same journal

Comparative Phytochemical Studies on the Aerial Parts of <i>Teucrium davaeanum</i> Coss. and <i>Teucrium zanonii</i> Pamp.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2026

A Rapid and Quantitative Fluorimetric Method for Protein-Targeting Small Molecule Drug Screening

A Rapid and Quantitative Fluorimetric Method for Protein-Targeting Small Molecule Drug Screening

Published on: October 16, 2015

In-Depth Analysis of the Data from an Interlaboratory Study of Quantitative Non-Target Screening-How Do the

Louise Malm¹, Nikiforos Alygizakis^2,3, Reza Aalizadeh⁴

¹Department of Chemistry, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius Väg 16, 114 18 Stockholm, Sweden.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)

|March 14, 2026

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning for environmental contaminant quantification shows promise. Predicted ionization efficiencies outperform traditional methods, though instrument parameters and data variability present challenges for accurate results.

Keywords:

interlaboratory comparison ionization efficiency liquid chromatography mass spectrometry non-target quantification response factor

More Related Videos

Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow

Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow

Published on: April 18, 2019

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media through an Inter-Laboratory Comparison

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media through an Inter-Laboratory Comparison

Published on: October 20, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2026

A Rapid and Quantitative Fluorimetric Method for Protein-Targeting Small Molecule Drug Screening

A Rapid and Quantitative Fluorimetric Method for Protein-Targeting Small Molecule Drug Screening

Published on: October 16, 2015

Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow

Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow

Published on: April 18, 2019

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media through an Inter-Laboratory Comparison

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media through an Inter-Laboratory Comparison

Published on: October 20, 2020

Area of Science:

Environmental Science
Analytical Chemistry
Computational Chemistry

Background:

Non-target screening with liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry is crucial for environmental monitoring.
Quantifying detected suspected contaminants remains a significant challenge, prompting the development of various approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

To analyze interlaboratory comparison data on quantification approaches for environmental contaminants.
To investigate the link between prediction errors and instrument parameters in machine learning-based quantification.
To assess the comparability of response factors (RFs) across different datasets and instrumental method limitations.

Main Methods:

Analysis of data from a previous interlaboratory comparison study.
Evaluation of machine learning-based quantification leveraging predicted ionization efficiencies.
Investigation of response factor (RF) comparability using linear models for scaling across datasets.

Main Results:

No specific instrument parameters were definitively linked to systematic prediction errors.
The choice of organic modifier and/or additive type impacted the detection of certain compounds.
Comparable logRFs were achieved across datasets after linear projection, but with compression for dissimilar datasets.
Compounds with lower logRF exhibited greater variability across datasets.

Conclusions:

Machine learning approaches using predicted ionization efficiencies show strong potential for contaminant quantification.
Instrumental method choices, particularly organic modifiers and additives, can influence detection.
Data scaling and compound-specific variability are key considerations for robust quantification across diverse datasets.