Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch01:15

Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch

8.6K
The history of therapeutic communication can be traced back to Florence Nightingale, who emphasized the importance of developing trusting relationships with patients. She taught that the presence of nurses with patients results in therapeutic healing.
Therapeutic communication is not the same as social interaction. Social interaction has no goal or purpose and consists of casual information sharing, whereas therapeutic communication has a plan or purpose for the conversation. Therapeutic...
8.6K
Tonicity in Animals00:59

Tonicity in Animals

128.3K
The tonicity of a solution determines if a cell gains or loses water in that solution. The tonicity depends on the permeability of the cell membrane for different solutes and the concentration of nonpenetrating solutes in the solution within and outside of the cell. If a semipermeable membrane hinders the passage of some solutes but allows water to follow its concentration gradient, water moves from the side with low osmolarity (i.e., less solute) to the side with higher osmolarity (i.e.,...
128.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Influence of Farmer-Sheep Interactions in the Home Flock on Behaviour and Cortisol in a Communal Grazing Flock of Polish Mountain Sheep.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2026
Same author

Horse Olfactory Exploration of Various Plants with Regard to Smell and Taste Familiarity.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2026
Same author

Does a Lack of Early Intensive Socialisation with Humans Exclude Goats from Participating in Animal-Assisted Services?

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2026
Same author

Lisosan G as a Modulator of Serum Lipid/Lipoprotein Changes, Lipid Metabolism and TGF-β1 Level in Neoplastic and Non-Neoplastic Liver Injury: A Rat Model Study.

Biology·2026
Same author

The Impact of Proinflammatory M1 Macrophages on the Proliferation and Expression of Cyclin E2, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases 4 and 7 in Hepatocytes Isolated from a Diethylnitrosamine-Induced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Rat Model.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Solid-State Fermented Cereals: Increased Phenolics and Their Role in Attenuating Liver Diseases.

Nutrients·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Using Facial Electromyography to Assess Facial Muscle Reactions to Experienced and Observed Affective Touch in Humans
04:27

Using Facial Electromyography to Assess Facial Muscle Reactions to Experienced and Observed Affective Touch in Humans

Published on: March 15, 2019

12.1K

Tactile Preferences in Goats: Implications for Animal-Assisted Interventions.

Patrycja Magdalena Masier1, Agnieszka Ziemiańska1, Kamila Janicka1

  • 1Institute of Biological Basis of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.

Animals : an Open Access Journal From MDPI
|March 14, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Tactile contact duration in animal-assisted interventions (AAI) is influenced by stroking order and body region. Goats showed shorter touch duration when stroking began first and longer contact when initiated on the trunk.

Keywords:
animal-assisted interventionsgoat-assisted interventionshuman–animal relationshiptactile contacttactile preferences

More Related Videos

In Vivo Methods to Assess Retinal Ganglion Cell and Optic Nerve Function and Structure in Large Animals
12:18

In Vivo Methods to Assess Retinal Ganglion Cell and Optic Nerve Function and Structure in Large Animals

Published on: February 26, 2022

10.5K
Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS
04:40

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Published on: July 30, 2020

3.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Using Facial Electromyography to Assess Facial Muscle Reactions to Experienced and Observed Affective Touch in Humans
04:27

Using Facial Electromyography to Assess Facial Muscle Reactions to Experienced and Observed Affective Touch in Humans

Published on: March 15, 2019

12.1K
In Vivo Methods to Assess Retinal Ganglion Cell and Optic Nerve Function and Structure in Large Animals
12:18

In Vivo Methods to Assess Retinal Ganglion Cell and Optic Nerve Function and Structure in Large Animals

Published on: February 26, 2022

10.5K
Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS
04:40

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Published on: July 30, 2020

3.3K

Area of Science:

  • Animal behavior studies
  • Human-animal interaction research
  • Animal-assisted interventions (AAI)

Background:

  • Tactile contact is central to animal-assisted interventions (AAI).
  • The impact of tactile contact on the animals' experience is not well understood.
  • Goats were used to investigate factors influencing tactile contact duration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine how body region, stroking sequence, and location enrichment affect tactile contact duration in goats.
  • To understand goat preferences and responses during human tactile interactions.
  • To provide insights into optimizing AAI for animal welfare.

Main Methods:

  • Seven adult goats participated in the study.
  • Tactile contact was analyzed based on body region (head/neck, trunk, hindquarters), stroking order (first, second, third), and location (goat house, pasture).
  • Statistical analysis was performed to determine the significance of these factors on contact duration.

Main Results:

  • The initial stroking position significantly impacted touch duration, with the first position (O1) resulting in shorter contact (p < 0.0001).
  • Initiating contact on the trunk (R2) led to significantly longer total contact duration (T) (p < 0.039).
  • Location enrichment did not significantly affect contact duration (p = 0.179), suggesting goats' receptiveness to human touch is consistent across environments.

Conclusions:

  • The initial phase of tactile interaction appears critical for overall contact duration.
  • Goats may show a preference for tactile contact initiated on their trunk.
  • Human contact remains attractive to goats irrespective of their environmental enrichment levels.