Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
Extreme-Aware Time-Series Forecasting via Weak-Label-Guided Mixture of Experts
Jialou Wang1, Jacob Sanderson1, Wai Lok Woo1
1School of Computer Science, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.
None:
Deep time-series forecasting models can achieve strong average accuracy under normal conditions, yet they often struggle with rare, high-impact extremes, where severe class imbalance biases learning toward majority dynamics. Although infrequent, these extremes frequently correspond to critical events such as natural disasters or power outages. We address this challenge with a weak-label-guided mixture of experts (WL-MoE) that routes each input window to lightweight specialists designed to capture distinct temporal regimes. To prevent routing collapse during early optimisation, WL-MoE follows a two-stage training curriculum. In Stage I, cluster-derived weak labels encourage diverse expert utilisation and promote specialisation under imbalance. In Stage II, guidance is removed and training proceeds solely with the forecasting objective, ensuring that inferences remain fully data-driven. The expert-based structure also supports interpretable routing via expert-usage profiling, enabling regime-level auditing of model behaviour in high-stakes settings. Across seven benchmark datasets, WL-MoE reduces the average MSE by approximately 7.9% and the extreme-case MSE by approximately 23.58% relative to the best baseline. In a UK flood forecasting study, it reduces the all-water MSE by 31.6% and the high-water MSE by approximately 35.0%. These results indicate that weak-label guidance can stabilise specialisation and improve reliability under rare extremes while keeping model behaviour auditable for real-world deployment.
Related Concept Videos
Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
End Point Prediction: Gran Plot
For potentiometric titration, the Gran plot is created by plotting...