Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
Understanding the Value of the Uterus: A Nationwide Cross-sectional Survey on Women's Preferences With Benign
Ashley Huynh1, Whitney Horner2, Danielle Antosh3
1Department of Urology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA (Drs. Huynh, and Chang).
Objective:
To identify clinical and demographic predictors associated with placing high value on the uterus among women with gynecological conditions in the United States.
Design:
Multicenter cross-sectional survey study utilizing the validated Value of the Uterus (VALUS) instrument and visual analog scale (VAS) to assess uterine value perceptions.
Setting:
Eleven medical centers across four U.S. regions (South, Southwest, West, and Northeast) from December 2023 to June 2024.
Patients:
Participants included adult patients with a uterus, assigned female sex at birth, and not considering future pregnancies. Of 906 surveys distributed, 714 completed surveys (79% response rate) were analyzed. Most participants identified as White (74.9%), were 45 to 60 years old (36%), and postmenopausal (55.3%). Regional distribution included South (35.6%), West (34.7%), Northeast (22%), and Southwest (4.3%).
Interventions:
Participants completed surveys assessing demographics, clinical history, the VALUS instrument (range 6-30), and a VAS question rating importance of uterine preservation (0-100 scale). Participants were stratified using median VALUS score of 16 as the cut-off: 336 (47%) had low uterine value (VALUS <16) and 378 (53%) had high uterine value (VALUS ≥16).
Measurements And Main Results:
The mean VAS score was 40.8 (SD: 32.4). Multivariable logistic regression, controlling for income, age, and urinary incontinence (UI), revealed significant predictors of high uterine value. Asian American/Pacific Islander (AAPI) individuals had higher odds compared to White individuals (adjusted OR = 2.34; 95% CI, 1.24-4.60; p = .01). Annual income of $20 000 to $49 000 was associated with higher odds vs the highest income bracket (adjusted OR = 2.53; 95% CI, 1.49-4.36; p <.01). Self-reported UI was associated with lower odds of high uterine value (adjusted OR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.97; p = .03).
Conclusion:
AAPI racial identity, lower income, and absence of UI predict placing high value on the uterus. Clinicians should incorporate these factors into shared decision-making when counseling patients regarding hysterectomy vs uterine-preserving procedures.
More Related Videos
07:20Intraoperative Detection of Subtle Endometriosis: A Novel Paradigm for Detection and Treatment of Pelvic Pain Associated with the Loss of Peritoneal Integrity
Published on: December 21, 2012
03:01Author Spotlight: A Reproductive Hysteroscopy Approach for Complete Endometrial Polyp Removal and Enhanced Endometrial Receptivity
Published on: August 2, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Uterus and Cervix
The uterus is securely anchored within the pelvic cavity by paired broad ligaments on either side. It is further stabilized by three pairs...
Uterine Tubes
Histology of the Uterus
The endometrium is the...
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
Disorders of the Female Reproductive System