Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Isolation01:24

DNA Isolation

45.9K
DNA isolation protocols can be fast and straightforward or complex and time-consuming depending on the type and quality of DNA required for further processing. For example, plasmid DNA extraction is a bit more complicated than genomic DNA extraction because of the need for an appropriate lysis method to separate plasmid DNA from gDNA during isolation. However, for specific applications, such as long-range DNA sequencing that require a good yield of high- quality DNA samples, we need to follow...
45.9K
DNA Isolation01:34

DNA Isolation

202.0K
DNA from cells is required for many biotechnology and research applications, such as molecular cloning. To remove and purify DNA from cells, researchers use various methods of DNA extraction. While the specifics of different protocols may vary, some general concepts underlie the process of DNA extraction.
202.0K
DNA Agarose Gel Electrophoresis02:35

DNA Agarose Gel Electrophoresis

118.3K
Agarose gel electrophoresis is a laboratory technique commonly used to separate DNA fragments by size. However, it can also be used to isolate and purify DNA fragments using a gel extraction protocol.
Gel extraction follows five major steps: running gel electrophoresis to separate fragments, isolating the individual bands, extracting DNA from those bands, and removing the dye and salts from the extracted mixture to obtain pure DNA.
In cloning experiments, both the insert and vector DNA...
118.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Variant Allele Characterization in STR Markers Using Next-Generation Sequencing.

Genes·2026
Same author

SiMSen-Seq STR sequencing across five laboratories enables lowered noise thresholds and improved allele calling.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2026
Same author

DNA polymerase characteristics influence noise levels in sequencing of short tandem repeats.

BMC genomics·2026
Same author

Advancing forensic SNP typing: Insights from an interlaboratory study of the FORCE panel.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2026
Same author

From crisis to routine - Standardization of SARS-CoV-2 genome detection by enhanced EQA schemes in a scientific pandemic network.

International journal of medical microbiology : IJMM·2025
Same author

Development of Publicly Available Forensic DNA Sequence Mixture Data.

Genes·2025
Same journal

GenoEye: A machine learning-based framework for the prediction of intermediate eye color phenotypes.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Sharp force trauma analysis without animal bones: A proposal for sustainable and ethical bone proxies.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Absolute dating of modern paper using <sup>14</sup>C bomb peak data of the paper fibers.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Forensic timeline investigation of Apple Health app on iOS.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Help v. harm: How a "lookup table" for evaluating DNA evidence given activity-level propositions could lead to wrongful convictions.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Development and Evaluation of an Iodoplatinate-Based Strip-Type Kit for On-Site Drug Screening in Beverages".

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Whole-Genome Deoxyribonucleic Acid Extraction from Mycobacterium Species via the Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide Technique
06:46

Whole-Genome Deoxyribonucleic Acid Extraction from Mycobacterium Species via the Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide Technique

Published on: December 12, 2025

1.1K

A quantitative method to assess DNA extraction efficiency.

Lauren E Mullen1, Erica L Romsos1, Peter M Vallone1

  • 1Applied Genetics Group, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.

Journal of Forensic Sciences
|March 16, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Forensic DNA extraction efficiency was benchmarked using digital PCR (dPCR). Results show significant differences between protocols for cellular samples, highlighting the need for accurate DNA quantification in forensic science.

Keywords:
DNA extractiondigital PCRextraction efficiencyextraction efficiency measurementmagnetic bead‐based extractionsilica‐based extraction

More Related Videos

Extraction of High Molecular Weight DNA from Microbial Mats
09:30

Extraction of High Molecular Weight DNA from Microbial Mats

Published on: July 7, 2011

20.2K
Collection and Extraction of Saliva DNA for Next Generation Sequencing
06:58

Collection and Extraction of Saliva DNA for Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 27, 2014

40.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Whole-Genome Deoxyribonucleic Acid Extraction from Mycobacterium Species via the Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide Technique
06:46

Whole-Genome Deoxyribonucleic Acid Extraction from Mycobacterium Species via the Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide Technique

Published on: December 12, 2025

1.1K
Extraction of High Molecular Weight DNA from Microbial Mats
09:30

Extraction of High Molecular Weight DNA from Microbial Mats

Published on: July 7, 2011

20.2K
Collection and Extraction of Saliva DNA for Next Generation Sequencing
06:58

Collection and Extraction of Saliva DNA for Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 27, 2014

40.2K

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Obtaining sufficient DNA is crucial for complete forensic short tandem repeat (STR) profiling.
  • Low DNA recovery during extraction can lead to loss of genetic material, impacting forensic DNA typing.
  • Existing studies often focus on overall profiling success rather than quantifying DNA loss during extraction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and apply a quantitative framework using digital PCR (dPCR) to benchmark DNA extraction efficiency.
  • To compare extraction efficiency between silica spin column and magnetic resin-based protocols.
  • To evaluate extraction efficiency across various input DNA amounts and sample types.

Main Methods:

  • A quantitative framework using digital PCR (dPCR) was developed to compare DNA amounts pre- and post-extraction.
  • Silica spin column and magnetic resin-based extraction protocols were evaluated.
  • Experiments used five input DNA amounts and three sample types: whole blood, human cells, and pre-extracted DNA (SRM 2372a).

Main Results:

  • Significant differences in extraction efficiency were observed between protocols for cellular samples.
  • Both protocols showed increased variability at the 1 ng DNA input threshold.
  • Pre-extracted DNA (SRM 2372a) did not accurately reflect cellular extraction dynamics, primarily measuring purification loss.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides a quantitative method (dPCR) to benchmark forensic DNA extraction efficiency.
  • Extraction protocols exhibit varying efficiencies for cellular samples, particularly at low DNA concentrations.
  • Standard reference materials like SRM 2372a may not fully represent the complexities of DNA extraction from cellular sources.