Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Web-based Tool to Support High-quality Radiotherapy in Clinics with Limited Resources
Published on: October 6, 2023
Development and Validation of an Automated Pediatric Cancer Staging Calculator Using the Toronto Pediatric Cancer
Iyad Sultan1,2,3, Anwar Al-Nassan2, Laith Alomari4
1Artificial Intelligence Office, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.
We developed an automated system for staging pediatric cancers using electronic health records, achieving high accuracy comparable to human experts. This tool standardizes staging for improved prognosis and research across childhood malignancies.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Medical Informatics
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Accurate pediatric cancer staging is crucial for prognosis and research.
- The Toronto Pediatric Cancer Stage Guidelines provide standardized staging for childhood cancers.
- Electronic health records (EHRs) offer a rich data source for developing automated clinical tools.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate an automated framework for staging pediatric cancers using EHR data.
- To assess the accuracy and consistency of the automated staging system against expert consensus.
- To establish a standardized, efficient method for pediatric cancer staging.
Main Methods:
- An automated extraction pipeline using agents was designed to process EHR notes within 3 months of diagnosis.
- The system selected appropriate staging schemas, calculated stages, and validated accuracy.
- The tool was tested on 433 pediatric cancer cases, with outputs compared to a ground truth established by four oncologists.
Main Results:
- The automated system achieved 91.2% overall accuracy compared to expert consensus.
- Independent runs showed high agreement (89.8%, Cohen's κ = 0.785).
- Accuracy was highest (97%) on the first staging attempt, decreasing on subsequent recalculations.
Conclusions:
- This study presents the first automated pediatric cancer staging system utilizing the Toronto criteria.
- The system demonstrates high accuracy and consistency, comparable to human experts.
- A hybrid approach, flagging uncertain cases for human review, can achieve ~97% accuracy with ~30% human input.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025