Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.2K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.2K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.7K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.7K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.1K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.7K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.7K
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions01:29

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

203
Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
203
Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity01:23

Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity

882
The similarity hypothesis suggests that individuals are more likely to form relationships with others who share similar attitudes, beliefs, values, and interests. This concept has been widely studied in social psychology, demonstrating that perceived similarity fosters interpersonal attraction. In an experiment supporting this hypothesis, participants were presented with fabricated information indicating that strangers held attitudes similar to their own. The results showed that participants...
882

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Molecular diversity and evolutionary dynamics of phage receptor binding proteins in Staphylococcus aureus: implications for phage therapy and resistance.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Retraction of "Acceleration of Wound Healing in Diabetic Rats through Poly Dimethylaminoethyl Acrylate-Hyaluronic Acid Polymeric Hydrogel Impregnated with a <i>Didymocarpus pedicellatus</i> Plant Extract".

ACS omega·2026
Same author

TSPO-mediated mitochondrial retrograde signaling primes the microglial NLRP3 inflammasome.

Pharmacological research·2026
Same author

Effect of containment strategies for respiratory diseases on infections imported via international travel to the USA: a modelling study.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Prescription Depressant-Involved Overdose Mortality in Massachusetts (2000-2023): A Cohort Study.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same author

A Mini-review on the Significance of Benzimidazole in Antifungal Drug Design: Past Insights and Current Applications.

Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 17, 2026

High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity
06:11

High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity

Published on: September 26, 2025

1.2K

Toward a science of human-AI teaming for decision making: A complementarity framework.

Cleotilde Gonzalez1,2, Kate Donahue3, Daniel G Goldstein4

  • 1Social and Decision Sciences Department, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

PNAS Nexus
|March 16, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study explores human-AI complementarity, where teams outperform individuals. It offers a framework and design principles for effective, human-centered artificial intelligence collaboration in critical decision-making.

Keywords:
alignmentcomplementarityhuman–AI teaming

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K
Estimate the Cognitive Load Using Electrocardiographic Measure: A Human-AI Collaborative Task
07:08

Estimate the Cognitive Load Using Electrocardiographic Measure: A Human-AI Collaborative Task

Published on: December 5, 2025

966

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 17, 2026

High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity
06:11

High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity

Published on: September 26, 2025

1.2K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K
Estimate the Cognitive Load Using Electrocardiographic Measure: A Human-AI Collaborative Task
07:08

Estimate the Cognitive Load Using Electrocardiographic Measure: A Human-AI Collaborative Task

Published on: December 5, 2025

966

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI)
  • Human Factors
  • Organizational Behavior
  • Ethics

Background:

  • Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integral to critical decision-making processes in health, safety, finance, and governance.
  • The primary challenge has shifted from human-AI collaboration to structuring this interaction for optimal complementarity.
  • Human-AI complementarity signifies a synergistic relationship where combined human-AI teams surpass the performance of either humans or AI operating independently.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advance the science of human-AI teaming for decision-making.
  • To propose a framework for understanding and engineering effective human-AI teams based on collective intelligence and core cognitive processes.
  • To identify sociotechnical factors and design principles crucial for achieving human-AI complementarity.

Main Methods:

  • Integrated insights from cognitive science, AI, human factors, organizational behavior, and ethics.
  • Proposed a framework grounded in collective intelligence, focusing on reasoning, memory, and attention.
  • Examined sociotechnical factors (team composition, trust, mental models, training, task structure) and outlined design principles for complementarity.

Main Results:

  • Identified key sociotechnical factors influencing human-AI team effectiveness.
  • Outlined actionable design principles for achieving complementarity, including role partitioning and continuous evaluation.
  • Emphasized the importance of transparency, trust, and human-centered design in AI collaboration.

Conclusions:

  • Human-AI complementarity is achievable through careful structuring of teams and tasks.
  • Effective human-AI teams require attention to cognitive processes, sociotechnical factors, and ethical considerations.
  • The proposed framework and principles offer a roadmap for developing high-performing, adaptive, transparent, and trustworthy human-AI systems aligned with human values.