Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
Training and Experience in Study Selection (TESS): study protocol for a pilot randomised trial within a systematic
Elayne Ahern1,2, Temitayo Adedeji1, Aoife Whiston1,2
1Department of Psychology, University of Limerick, Castletroy, Limerick, V94 T9PX, Ireland.
Background:
Systematic reviews can be resource-intensive and require timely completion, yet experienced reviewers may have limited availability, necessitating the inclusion of novice screeners. This Study Within A Review (SWAR) will pilot and examine the feasibility of study methods to explore whether training and level of experience within the screening pair affects the reliability of decisions made by novice screeners during study selection.
Methods:
A 2(training: task-specific, minimal guidance) x 2(experience level of screening partner, 'Reviewer 1': moderate experience, minimal experience) pilot randomised trial will be conducted within a host systematic review in the topic area of depression and psychosocial functioning. Participants ( N = 12), consisting of higher education students with no prior experience in evidence synthesis, will be randomised to one of the four conditions to complete a standardised study selection task at title/abstract level ( k = 219 records) on Covidence screening software, blindly and independently. Total participation time is estimated at 5 hours. Screening decisions made by participants will be assessed for reliability against the consensus-based decisions by two reviewers with content and methodological expertise (expert standard), through calculation of chance-corrected Cohen's kappa, prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK), and percentage of agreement, then compared across the conditions. Secondary outcomes will include reliability within the screening pair (participant and allocated screening partner), validity of screening decisions (false positives, false negatives, sensitivity, specificity), feasibility measures, including time taken to complete the study selection task and success of blinding, as well as acceptability.
Conclusions:
Findings will be used to inform the design of subsequent trial work to determine the efficacy of training and screener pairing for study selection. Ultimately, these insights will help to build capacity among novice screeners to engage with evidence synthesis and work alongside experienced review teams. Registration Northern Ireland Hub for Trials Methodology Research SWAR Registry: SWAR 38.
More Related Videos
10:38Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
09:47A Methodological Protocol and Considerations for Transcranial Ultrasonic Stimulation in Exploratory Clinical Human Studies
Published on: December 12, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Blind Procedures
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Types of Selection
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...