Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
Published on: February 23, 2024
IRIS: A Machine Learning-Based Pose Reranking Tool for RNA-Ligand Docking
Jason Andrew Amburn1, Shalini J Rukmani2,3, Jerry M Parks2,4
1Bredesen Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Graduate Education, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, United States.
Abstract:
Given their fundamental roles in cellular processes and disease pathogenesis, RNA molecules are promising therapeutic targets. Predicting the 3D structure of RNA-ligand complexes using computational docking is a key element of rational, structure-based inhibitor design. However, RNA-ligand docking remains challenging, due in part to intrinsic properties of RNA such as structural flexibility and a highly charged phosphate backbone. rDock, a widely used RNA docking program, can generate ligand poses close to the experimental structure, but its scoring function frequently fails to rank these poses above less accurate alternatives. To supplement rDock, here we introduce the Intelligent RNA Interaction Scorer (IRIS), a regression model leveraging physicochemical and interaction-based features and trained on the largest data set of experimental nucleic acid-ligand complexes compiled to date for any ML-based tool designed for RNA docking (608 structures). IRIS improves rDock RNA-ligand pose ranking relative to the use of rDock scores alone. Using the best-performing rDock protocol on the RNA portion of the data set, we find that at least one of the 100 top generated poses for any given complex is within 2.0 Å RMSD of the native pose in 86.3% of test complexes. Of these 86.3%, the default rDock scoring function ranks the correct pose first in 42.7% of cases. IRIS improves this latter fraction to 59.8% and increases the success rate for selecting a near-native pose among the top five ranked poses from 64.6% to 78.0%. IRIS thus significantly enhances pose ranking accuracy and can be seamlessly integrated into docking pipelines to rerank ligand poses in RNA-targeted drug discovery.
More Related Videos
05:08Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
Published on: July 8, 2025
10:29Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Ligand Binding Sites
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER