Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data
Published on: July 27, 2018
Increasing Innu participation in public health: a qualitative study of data governance among Innu in Labrador, Canada
Leonor Mercedes Ward1, Courtney Heffernan2, Gonzalo Gustavo Alvarez3
1Tuberculosis Program Evaluation and Research Unit, College of Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Introduction:
Indigenous Peoples are not always engaged in setting health priorities and decry misapplication and misinterpretation of their data. Indigenous data governance and sovereignty can help overcome these issues, but they are variably implemented across Nations. Public health data governance is uniquely challenging, with implementation gaps presenting an exciting opportunity to define and remove barriers at all levels of government.
Methods:
We sought to identify barriers (what) and facilitators (how) to implementing a local data governance plan with the goal of increasing Innu participation in public health. Working with two First Nations in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, and supported by strong relationships, 18 participants who work with Innu health data across federal, provincial and Innu jurisdictions were interviewed and participated in group discussions to produce rich qualitative data on the subject. The research plan was led by the First Nations.
Results:
Participants identified that size and organisation matter to data governance, and novel partnerships must be considered to achieve the economies of scale necessary for infrastructure. Public health data have multiple custodians and require governance across multiple jurisdictions. Creating a round table (a space for dialogue among equals) to guide the appropriate collection, use and reporting of locally relevant public health data has emerged as an actionable recommendation. In this model, public health data were viewed as co-created by all parties, while Innu led analysis and interpretation. Barriers to data governance included the complexity of accessing data, lack of space to meet as equals, lack of common goals, mistrust and racism. Facilitators included the recognised need for an adequately resourced Innu Health Data Office, communication, trust and good relationships.
Conclusion:
For Innu, data governance advances self-determination, potentially redressing the current inequitable distribution of power in public health planning. Describing the challenges Innu face in operationalising public health data governance and strategies to overcome them may be generalisable to other Indigenous Nations attempting to do the same, especially those with small populations.
Related Concept Videos
Purpose of Health Records II
International Nursing Organizations I
ICN member organizations work to advance the field of nursing and healthcare via policies, partnerships, lobbying, professional...
Data Collection I

