Intravascular Lithotripsy Is Associated With Superior Clinical Outcomes Compared to Atherectomy: A Large-Scale,
Charles D Miks1, Grant K Ozaki1, Chirayu R Shukla1
1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa, USA.
Insights
Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) shows better 1-year outcomes and fewer complications than atherectomy (ATH) for severe coronary calcification. This real-world data supports IVL as a safe alternative for complex coronary lesions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Severe coronary calcification poses challenges for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Atherectomy (ATH) and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) are plaque modification techniques.
- Limited large-scale data compares long-term outcomes of IVL versus ATH.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare 1-year clinical outcomes between IVL and ATH.
- To evaluate 30-day procedural complications associated with IVL and ATH.
- To analyze temporal trends in the utilization of IVL and ATH.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study using TriNetX Research Network data from 47 health organizations.
- Analysis of adults with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing single-vessel PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES) and either IVL or ATH.
- Propensity matching and evaluation of annual utilization trends from 2013 to 2024.
Main Results:
- IVL was associated with lower 1-year risks of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and MACE compared to ATH.
- IVL demonstrated reduced 30-day procedural complications, including less bleeding and contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CA-AKI).
- IVL utilization rapidly increased, surpassing ATH after 2022.
Conclusions:
- IVL is linked to more favorable 1-year outcomes and fewer short-term complications than ATH in a real-world setting.
- Findings support IVL as a safe and effective option for complex coronary lesions.
- Randomized trials are needed to confirm causality and further validate IVL's efficacy.
Background:
Coronary artery disease (CAD) with severe calcification remains a growing challenge in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Atherectomy (ATH) has long been used for plaque modification, whereas intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has emerged as a promising alternative. Large-scale comparative data on long-term outcomes are limited.
Aims:
To compare 1-year clinical outcomes, 30-day procedural complications, and temporal trends between IVL and ATH use.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX Research Network, analyzing de-identified data from 47 health care organizations. Adults with CAD undergoing single-vessel PCI with drug-eluting stent (DES) and either IVL or ATH were included. Outcomes were assessed after propensity matching, and annual utilization trends were evaluated from 2013 to 2024.
Results:
We identified 13,499 patients who underwent DES with IVL (n = 7026) or ATH (n = 6473). After matching, 5768 patients remained in each cohort. At 1 year, IVL was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.58-0.72; p < 0.0001), myocardial infarction (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.66-0.96; p = 0.0166), and MACE (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.62-0.82; p < 0.0001). IVL also reduced 30-day procedural complications (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.61-0.97; p = 0.0271), with less bleeding (RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.31-0.62; p < 0.0001) and CA-AKI (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.55-0.91; p = 0.0068). IVL use increased rapidly and surpassed ATH after 2022.
Conclusion:
In this large, real-world registry, IVL was associated with more favorable 1-year outcomes and fewer 30-day complications than ATH. These findings support IVL as a safe and effective alternative for complex coronary lesions, emphasizing the need for validation in randomized trials to assess for causality.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care


