Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Cooling or Warming the Esophagus to Reduce Esophageal Injury During Left Atrial Ablation in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: March 15, 2020
Gastric ischemic conditioning before esophagectomy: contemporary practices and insights from an international survey
Alberto Aiolfi1, Davide Bona2, Andrea Sozzi2
1I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Via C. Belgioioso, 173, 20157, Milan, Italy. alberto.aiolfi86@gmail.com.
Background:
Gastric ischemic conditioning (GIC) before esophagectomy has been proposed to enhance the vascular submucosal network of the gastric conduit and perfusion at the anastomotic site. Its advantages remain controversial due to inconsistent literature findings, often attributed to heterogeneity in patient selection, targeted vessels, timing, and variations in GIC technique. We conducted a survey to assess contemporary surgical practices regarding GIC utilization prior to esophagectomy among expert foregut surgeons.
Methods:
A Google-based survey was conducted in accordance with the CHERRIES checklist, developed following an extensive literature review and directed towards expert foregut surgeons. The survey comprised 39 questions covering demographic data, professional experience, surgical modalities for esophagectomy, indications, timing, and technical aspects for GIC.
Results:
Overall, 115 expert foregut surgeons participated in the survey (response rate 76.7%). Overall, 56.4% indicated that they do not perform GIC whereas 43.6% reported utilizing GIC before esophagectomy. Main reasons for not performing GIC included lack of supporting literature (57.1%) and no clear benefit in reducing AL rate (42.9%). Selective GIC use was most often based on celiac trunk stenosis or calcification (67.7%), history of coronary stenting/bypass (48.4%), and thoracic aorta calcification (41.9%). Overall, 59.6% of experts using GIC preferred laparoscopy while 40.4% favored embolization. Laparoscopy was preferred for cancer staging, jejunostomy formation, and hospital availability; embolization was preferred for its simplicity, avoidance of general anesthesia, absence of adhesions, and ability to dynamically assess the vascular anatomy intraprocedural. The left gastric artery was the most frequently targeted vessel (> 90%) for both laparoscopy and embolization, either individually or in combination with the short gastric vessels or the left gastroepiploic artery. Almost 70% of GIC users indicated a preference for performing GIC ≥ 14 days before esophagectomy.
Conclusions:
The survey indicates that less than half of the experts support GIC prior to esophagectomy, preferring its selective application. Laparoscopy is preferred over embolization, likely due to better tumor staging and greater hospital availability. Most respondents also prefer GIC to be performed more than 14 days before esophagectomy.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...

