Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 18, 2026

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Challenging esophageal surgery: risk factors, outcomes, and a comparative single-center analysis
Leonardo Duranti1, Luca Tavecchio2, Luigi Rolli2
1Thoracic Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Via Venezian1, 20133, Milan, Italy. leonardo.duranti@istitutotumori.mi.it.
Introduction:
Esophageal cancer ranks as the eighth most common cancer among human populations and stands as the sixth leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Effective treatment of esophageal tumors necessitates a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach encompassing surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy.
Method:
In our series of 203 esophagectomies conducted at our institution, we identified 28 procedures (13.7%) categorized as "challenging esophagectomies" based on specific predefined criteria outlined in the text. These criteria encompassed factors such as medical comorbidities, local tumor extension, and involvement of lymph nodes. The remaining 175 patients comprised the group of "standard esophagectomies".
Results:
We compared our study group with the standard group. There was no statistical difference between the two groups regarding overall 5 year survival and disease-free survival. In the "challenging esophagectomies" group, our overall 5 year survival rate was 34.2%, and the disease-free survival rate was 56, 4%. In the "standard" group, our overall 5 year survival rate was 48, 6%, and the disease-free survival rate was 58, 6%. Specifically, in the "challenging esophagectomies" group, the post-operative mortality rate stood at 8%, with major complications occurring in 33% of cases, in "standard group" the post-operative mortality rate stood at 2%, with major complications occurring in 23% of cases.
Conclusion:
Despite the challenges associated with difficult esophagectomies, they play a pivotal role not only as salvage surgeries but also as a crucial component within the integrated multimodal treatment strategy. Patient selection emerges as a critical factor influencing outcomes. For this purpose, we propose a classification system of criteria and scores to define the level of complexity in this surgery.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction

