Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

12.7K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
12.7K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.5K
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.9K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.9K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

521
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
521
Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

326
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in...
326
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

621
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
621

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The impact of triglyceride-glucose index on short-term prognosis in patients with acute myocarditis.

BMC cardiovascular disorders·2026
Same author

Iron overload in the tumor microenvironment induces CD8<sup>+</sup> T cell ferroptosis and dysfunction.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Associations between aggregate index of systemic inflammation and endometriosis risk utilizing logistic regression analysis.

Frontiers in medicine·2026
Same author

Personalized prediction of initial valproic acid dose in children with epilepsy using machine learning techniques.

International journal of clinical pharmacy·2026
Same author

Social Support and Family Resilience Among Young and Middle-aged Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: The Mediating Role of Sense of Coherence and Coping Styles.

The Journal of cardiovascular nursing·2026
Same author

Polyphenols from sauce-flavor distiller's grains: Improving the fecal microbial structure and intestinal barrier function.

Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)·2026
Same journal

Hidden Data Recovery and Forecasting via Next-Generation Reservoir Computing With Multiscale Delay Selection.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

CAFF-CIL: Causality-Aware Freedom Forgetting Approach for Class-Incremental Learning.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

Harmonic Autoencoding Framework for Multiple Tasks in Magnetic Particle Imaging Reconstruction.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

A Survey on Human-Centric Voice-Face Multimodal Learning.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

Vision-Assisted Foundation Model for Solving Multitask Vehicle Routing Problems.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

FP3O: Enabling Proximal Policy Optimization in Multiagent Cooperation With Parameter-Sharing Versatility.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats
06:57

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats

Published on: February 4, 2016

10.7K

CIRCUS: A Causal Intervention-Based Framework for Enhancing Counterfactual Fairness in Trained Classifiers.

Qifen Yang, Yuhui Deng, Jiande Huang

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
    |March 16, 2026
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces a new framework, CIRCUS, to reduce biases in artificial intelligence models using causal inference. CIRCUS enhances model fairness by correcting predictions based on sensitive attributes, improving societal trust in AI.

    More Related Videos

    A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
    08:12

    A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

    Published on: March 1, 2022

    2.1K
    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
    05:37

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

    Published on: September 16, 2022

    2.3K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: May 5, 2026

    Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats
    06:57

    Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats

    Published on: February 4, 2016

    10.7K
    A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
    08:12

    A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

    Published on: March 1, 2022

    2.1K
    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
    05:37

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

    Published on: September 16, 2022

    2.3K

    Area of Science:

    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Machine Learning
    • Causal Inference

    Background:

    • Ensuring fairness and mitigating bias in AI models is critical for societal acceptance, especially in sensitive applications.
    • Counterfactual fairness, grounded in causal inference, is a prominent fairness concept requiring consistent predictions across modified sensitive attributes.
    • Existing methods often lack fidelity in structural causal models (SCMs) due to simultaneous generation processes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To mitigate counterfactual biases in AI models through causal intervention.
    • To propose a novel framework, CIRCUS, for enhancing counterfactual fairness in classifiers.
    • To develop an effective causal intervention and counterfactual generation method.

    Main Methods:

    • Proposed the causal inference tabular generative adversarial network (CITGAN) for causal intervention and counterfactual generation, enforcing causal consistency via an end-to-end topological process.
    • Integrated exogenous variable inference with sequential generation in CITGAN to preserve structural functional dependencies.
    • Developed the CIRCUS framework, which generates counterfactually discriminatory samples (CDSs) using causal intervention and applies label preprocessing for bias correction.

    Main Results:

    • The CIRCUS framework effectively enhances counterfactual fairness while maintaining robust classification performance.
    • For Deep Neural Network (DNN) models, CIRCUS reduced MMD_L and MMD_K values by an average of 39.7% and 40.4%, respectively.
    • For Residual Network (ResNet) models, CIRCUS achieved reductions of 56.7% and 54.5% in MMD_L and MMD_K values, respectively.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed CITGAN architecture and CIRCUS framework offer a robust solution for mitigating counterfactual biases in AI.
    • Causal intervention is an effective strategy for enhancing counterfactual fairness in machine learning classifiers.
    • The results demonstrate significant improvements in fairness metrics without compromising classification accuracy.