Handling Asynchronous Scheduling Functions in Periodic Event-Triggered Gain-Scheduled Control With Guaranteed
Abstract:
This article deals with periodic event-triggered control (PETC) of nonlinear systems, considering an equivalent quasi-linear parameter-varying (quasi-LPV) polytopic representation of the nonlinear plant and a gain-scheduled controller for stabilization. Although gain-scheduling approaches allow one to improve the results and extend the set of feasible solutions to the co-design problem, the event-based sampling induces the so-called asynchronous scheduling functions, which void the gain-scheduling advantages, leading to conservative results, especially in the PETC framework. The dominant approaches for dealing with this issue consider a bounding assumption on the mismatched scheduling functions, but do not guarantee that those bounds cannot be violated during the closed-loop operation. To properly manage the asynchronous phenomenon, we propose a novel PETC scheme. Based on the looped-functional approach and a nonquadratic Lyapunov function, we derive linear matrix inequality (LMI)-based conditions to co-design the event-triggering mechanism and the gain-scheduled controller. These conditions are incorporated into a multiobjective optimization problem to maximize the estimate of the region of attraction of the origin and minimize the number of transmissions of the PETC scheme. We prove that the closed-loop trajectories initiated in the estimated region of attraction converge toward the origin without violating the boundedness of the mismatched scheduling functions during operation. Two numerical examples are provided to illustrate the methodology.
Related Concept Videos
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
Frequency-Domain Interpretation of PD Control
The proportional control gain, combined with the...
Properties of Laplace Transform-II
Time differentiation involves analyzing the rate of change of a function over time. Mathematically, it is the derivative of a function with respect to time. This concept can be likened to tracking...
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control
Phase-lag controllers do not place a pole at zero, but instead influence the steady-state error by amplifying any...
Linear time-invariant Systems
The input-output behavior of an LTI system can be fully defined by its response to an impulsive excitation at its input. Once this impulse response is known, the system's reaction to any other input can be...
Reinforcement Schedules
Once a behavior is learned,...


