Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
Published on: August 15, 2025
Effectiveness of Structured Case-Based Learning Versus Traditional Didactics in Enhancing Clinical Decision-Making
Xiangyao Sun1, Xiaolong Chen2, Jiang Huang2
1Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University; sun.xiang.yao@163.com.
None:
Clinical decision-making is central to orthopedic residency training but is challenging to teach using traditional didactic lectures, which emphasize information transmission over active reasoning. Structured case-based learning (CBL) has been proposed as a learner-centered alternative that targets diagnostic reasoning, management planning, and decision-making under uncertainty. To compare the educational effectiveness of structured case-based learning versus traditional didactic lectures (TDL) in enhancing clinical decision-making among orthopedic surgery residents. A retrospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted across four postgraduate medical education programs in China. A total of 120 orthopedic residents were included (CBL and TDL, n = 60). Both groups completed an 8-week curriculum covering eight high-risk orthopedic topics with equivalent instructional time and objectives. The CBL intervention incorporated flipped pre-work, progressive case disclosure, forced decision nodes, and structured debriefing, while the TDL arm used slide-based lectures with question-and-answer periods. The primary outcome was a prespecified composite clinical decision-making score derived from standardized objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) decision stations, a Script Concordance Test, and time-to-correct-decision metrics. Secondary outcomes included knowledge performance, appropriateness of management, communication scores, retention at 8 weeks, learner satisfaction, engagement, and cognitive load. Assessors were blinded to the instructional group. Baseline characteristics and performance were comparable between groups. The CBL group achieved significantly higher composite decision-making scores than the TDL group at post-intervention and at 8-week retention, with moderate effect sizes. Secondary outcomes, including OSCE performance, reasoning under uncertainty, decision speed, knowledge scores, appropriateness of management, and communication ratings, consistently favored CBL. Learner satisfaction was higher in the CBL group, while cognitive load and attendance were similar between groups. Structured case-based learning was associated with superior educational performance compared with traditional lectures among orthopedic residents, with durable gains in decision-making. These findings support the integration of structured, decision-focused case discussions into residency didactic curricula.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Case Studies
