Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 18, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
Published on: November 9, 2018
A Note on "A Comparison of Two Methods for Adaptive Multi-Arm Two-Stage Design"
Silke Jörgens1, Gernot Wassmer1,2
1Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Abstract:
Mehta and Kappler compare two approaches to adaptive multi-arm multi-stage testing: Stagewise MAMS based on the inverse normal combination test, and cumulative MAMS based on the conditional error rate approach. They show the difference in power between these approaches and conjecture as to its origin. While the results they report are well known, we would like to add a more differentiated insight into the reasons for the power difference.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Group Design
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

