Interpretable multi-modality consensus QSAR framework: integrating machine and deep learning for enhanced
Fauzan Syarif Nursyafi1, Muhammad Adnan Pramudito2, Yunendah Nur Fuadah3
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Computational Medicine Lab, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
Accurate toxicity assessment is essential for chemical safety, but experimental testing is costly, slow, and ethically constrained, motivating the adoption of computational approaches such as quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR). However, many QSAR models still rely on a single descriptor type or algorithm and relatively small, endpoint‑specific datasets, which limits robustness, interpretability, and broader applicability. To overcome these limitations, this study develops an interpretable multi‑modality consensus QSAR framework that integrates multiple molecular representations with both machine learning (ML) and deep learning to predict eight mechanistically diverse toxicity endpoints - skin sensitization, respiratory toxicity, AMES mutagenicity, hepatotoxicity, developmental toxicity, cardiotoxicity, drug‑induced nephrotoxicity, and neurotoxicity - across 30 160 unique compounds. Models for each descriptor-algorithm combination were optimized using 10-fold cross-validation, and top-performing models were combined into weighted multi-modality consensus predictors based on cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) weights. Across all endpoints, multi-modality consensus models consistently achieved moderate to excellent performance on unseen and external sets (AUC 0.80-0.99, balanced accuracy (BACC) 0.76-0.90). DeLong's test confirmed that multi-modality consensus models outperformed the best individual models, with significant AUC improvements (p < 0.05) in seven of eight endpoints. Chemical space and applicability domain analyses demonstrated broad coverage of diverse compounds, with in-domain predictions consistently achieving higher and more stable performance, while SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis highlighted global features and mechanistic-level motifs, supporting the model's biological plausibility and reliability. Overall, this multi-modality consensus framework provides a reliability aware and interpretable approach for broad-spectrum toxicity prediction and multi-endpoint chemical safety assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Quantitative Aspects of Drug-Receptor Interaction
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence its...
Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches
The model approach uses mathematical models to describe changes in drug concentration over time. Pharmacokinetic models help characterize drug behavior in patients, predict drug concentration in the body fluids, calculate optimum dosage regimens, and evaluate the risk of toxicity. However, ensuring that the model fits the experimental data accurately...
Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...

