Aesthetic-Cosmetic Concern and Its Importance: A Questionnaire-Based Comparative Study of Posterior-Midline and...

Introduction Literature concerning the aesthetic appeal of incisions following minimally invasive spine surgery is sparse. We aimed to address this gap in the literature and to understand the cosmetic preferences of patients with respect to the postoperative scars after spine surgery. Objectives This cross-sectional study aimed to identify patient preferences and aesthetic concerns related to surgical scars in MIST (minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)) and SOST (standard open surgical TLIF). Methodology A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted among people visiting an outpatient spine clinic to compare the aesthetic preference of patients. The study included 399 participants, with an age of 33.58 (12.82) years, consisting of 229 females and 170 males. The responses to the questionnaire with illustrative scars were analyzed with descriptive statistics to arrive at a conclusion. Results Among the participants, 238 expressed aesthetic concerns about scar appearance. A total of 153 (38.3%) respondents were more concerned about a scar on the back when compared to scars elsewhere on the body. A total of 306 (76.69%) individuals preferred the scar of surgical midline posterior TLIF (SOST) while 93 selected the MIST scar (p < 0.001). Notably, 139 of these participants (45.42%) changed their preference to MIST scars (p < 0.001) upon learning about the advantages of the modern MIST technique. Conclusions Patient-oriented aesthetic outcomes in surgery are essential. However, a lumbar spine surgical scar is of less concern than scars elsewhere on the body. Midline scars were noted to be more aesthetically pleasing than paramedian scars. Counselling regarding the advantages of modern minimally invasive techniques, however, can improve patient acceptance of the procedure despite the scar. Addressing patient concerns about scar appearance, psychological impact, and social implications should be integral to surgical decision-making and postoperative care.