Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 18, 2026

An Educational Video Demonstration of How to Prone a Critically Ill Intubated Patient
Published on: November 30, 2022
Restrictive vs Liberal Physical Restraint Strategies in Critically Ill Patients: The R2D2-ICU Randomized Clinical
Romain Sonneville1,2, Camille Couffignal1,3, Florian Sigaud4
1Université Paris Cité, IAME, INSERM UMR 1137, Paris, France.
A low-use wrist-strap physical restraint strategy did not improve outcomes for intensive care unit (ICU) patients on mechanical ventilation. This approach did not reduce days free of coma or delirium compared to high-use restraints.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Patient Safety
- Mechanical Ventilation
Background:
- The impact of physical restraints, specifically wrist straps, on outcomes for mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU is not well-established.
- Understanding the optimal strategy for using physical restraints is crucial for improving patient care and safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a restrictive, low-use wrist-strap physical restraint strategy versus a liberal, high-use strategy in critically ill patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation.
- To determine if a less frequent use of wrist straps impacts key patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- An open-label randomized clinical trial involving 405 adult patients across 10 ICUs in France.
- Patients were assigned to either a low-use restraint strategy (avoiding straps unless severe agitation present) or a high-use strategy (systematic application and daily reassessment).
- Primary outcome was days alive without coma or delirium within 14 days post-randomization.
Main Results:
- No significant difference was observed in the mean days alive without coma or delirium between the low-use (6.67 days) and high-use (6.30 days) strategy groups (adjusted mean difference: 0.37 days; P=.51).
- The incidence of self-extubation was similar in both groups (9.2% low-use vs. 8.5% high-use).
- Day-90 mortality was 37.2% in the low-use group and 41.0% in the high-use group.
Conclusions:
- A low-use wrist-strap physical restraint strategy did not demonstrate a benefit over a high-use strategy in reducing days free of coma or delirium in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.
- The findings suggest that current practices regarding the use of wrist straps in this population may not significantly alter key neurological and safety outcomes.
- Further research may be needed to explore alternative non-restraint strategies for managing agitation and preventing adverse events in ventilated patients.
Related Concept Videos
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Acute Respiratory Failure-IV
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
Acute Respiratory Failure-III
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...

