Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

26.1K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
26.1K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

1.5K
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
1.5K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

11.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

376
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
376
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

520
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
520
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

3.5K
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
3.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Infection prevention and control measures for Ebola and Marburg disease: a series of rapid reviews.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Development and psychometric evaluation of the Spanish Cooking Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (SCSEQ) for Spanish University Students.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Critical Approaches for Nursing Research: Critical Mixed Methods Research.

Creative nursing·2026
Same author

The psychosocial impacts of having eating and drinking difficulties after stroke: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Disability and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Developing a rehabilitation intervention for eating and drinking difficulties following stroke through co-design stakeholder workshops.

BMC health services research·2026
Same author

Longitudinal changes in motivational determinants of sustainable diets during a pilot blended digital behavior change intervention: A mixed methods study.

PLOS digital health·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.7K

Updating the Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) Reporting Guidelines: Protocol for a Methodological

Sarah Munce1, Sergi Fàbregues2, Quan Nha Hong3,4

  • 1Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Bloorview Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.

JMIR Research Protocols
|March 17, 2026
PubMed
Summary

This study updates the Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) guidelines to enhance the quality and transparency of mixed methods research in health services. The new GRAMMS 2.0 will improve reporting consistency and clarity for researchers and knowledge users.

Keywords:
evidence-informed guidelinesguideline developmentmethodological reviewmixed-methods researchmodified delphi process

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.7K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Methodology
  • Scientific Reporting

Background:

  • Mixed methods research (MMR) integrates qualitative and quantitative approaches for deeper understanding but often lacks consistent integration in reporting.
  • The original Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) guidelines (2008) are outdated due to rapid advancements in MMR.
  • A persistent gap in the implementation of integration in MMR reporting has existed for nearly two decades.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an updated GRAMMS 2.0 guideline and checklist for improved reporting of MMR in health services research.
  • Enhance consistency, transparency, and quality in reporting mixed methods studies.
  • Address the evolving landscape of mixed methods research and its application in health.

Main Methods:

  • A methodological review to identify relevant reporting criteria from the mixed methods literature.
  • A modified Delphi approach and consensus meeting to prioritize components for the updated GRAMMS 2.0 guideline.

Main Results:

  • The project has secured funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research for April 2025.
  • The methodological review and Delphi process are underway to inform the development of GRAMMS 2.0.

Conclusions:

  • The GRAMMS 2.0 guideline aims to significantly improve the consistency, transparency, and quality of MMR reporting.
  • It will benefit researchers, knowledge users, peer reviewers, and editors, enhancing the clarity and transferability of findings.
  • Ultimately, GRAMMS 2.0 will facilitate more efficient use of mixed methods research in health, optimizing research investments.