Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
Published on: April 6, 2018
When Toys Talk Science: How motivational beliefs shape elementary-aged girls' and boys' toy choices
Valerie P Bambha1, Yusra Ahmed1, Pooja Roy2
1University of Houston, USA; University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, USA.
Abstract:
STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) experiences in middle childhood are linked to later STEM achievement and motivational beliefs, including the value that children place on STEM and their expectancy of pursuing a STEM career. Toy manufacturers often use gendered STEM product marketing, such as targeting puzzles or science experiment kits specifically to boys or girls. However, little is known about how children's STEM motivational beliefs intersect with girls' and boys' interest in gendered STEM toys. The present study used path analysis to empirically evaluate aspects of Situated Expectancy Value Theory (SEVT; Eccles & Wigfield, 2023) in 665 children (kindergarten to Grade 5; 356 girls; M = 8.18 years) and their interest in gendered and gender-neutral STEM toys. Girls' STEM value and career expectancy predicted their gender-congruent (i.e., girl-coded; pink magnet), gender-incongruent (i.e., boy-coded; Super Hero LEGO set), and gender-neutral (e.g., primary-colored blocks) toy ratings. In contrast, career expectancy did not relate to any of boys' toy ratings, although STEM value had similar predictive patterns for their gender-incongruent (i.e., girl-coded) and gender-neutral toy ratings. Findings support SEVT by showing that motivational beliefs such as self-concept and STEM value mediate links between boys' and girls' perceived ability and STEM toy preferences, with STEM career expectancy serving as an additional mediator for girls. Implications for understanding the mechanisms underpinning STEM engagement and considerations for aligning toy design with children's developing STEM beliefs are discussed.
Related Concept Videos
Drive-Reduction Theory: Push Theory of Motivation
Motivational Bias
Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation
The theory differentiates between...
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Self-Efficacy
Social Foundations of Self I: Play and Game

