Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
A critical look at the evolution of randomized controlled trials: new and old ethical issues
Hasan Yazici1, Yesim Ozguler2, Sinem N Esatoglu2
1Internal Medicine (Rheumatology), Academic Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Abstract:
The traditional randomized controlled trial (RCT), a most valuable tool of evidence-based medicine, is rapidly evolving into new forms. The main reason behind this evolution is the basic explanatory nature of RCT and the related need for real-world data to help with daily medical care. The marked progress in data accumulation in technology is a driving element. The many forms of RCT with pragmatic elements are the main outcome of this evolution. Another, this time we consider a devolutionary form of RCT is the safety outcome trial (SOT) with primary outcomes of irreversible harm. In this review we discuss the various ethical issues involved in this evolution and devolution under the principles of the Belmont Report. We find the utilization of pragmatic elements in SOTs with primary outcomes of irreversible harm particularly worrisome.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Blinding
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:

