Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

High-Resolution Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Small Animals
Published on: December 16, 2022
Comparison of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Among 18F-FDG Dual-Gated PET/CT, Single-Gated PET/MRI, and Cardiac
Pariyaporn Toompong1, Attapon Jantarato2, Dheeratama Siripongsatian2
1National Cyclotron and PET Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand pariyaporn.too@cra.ac.th.
Abstract:
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a critical parameter in the evaluation of cardiac function, and its measurement can guide treatment decisions in patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. We obtained LVEF measurements with gated PET-based methods to determine if they produced comparable results to those obtained with cardiac MRI. Methods: Patients with breast cancer who visited the National Cyclotron and PET Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, in Bangkok, Thailand, between July 1, 2022, and February 28, 2023, for LVEF assessment were included in this prospective study. All patients underwent PET/CT using 3 different reconstruction techniques: dual-gated with electrocardiography and respiratory gating, dual-gated with artificial intelligence-assisted list-mode respiratory-compensated PET/CT (dual-gated list-mode PET/CT), and single-gated (electrocardiography-gated) PET/CT. Additionally, single-gated PET/MRI and cardiac MRI were performed to collect data on end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and LVEF. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in LVEF measurements between any modality. Dual-gated PET/CT showed the lowest average percentage difference when compared with cardiac MRI (6.45%). Differences in EDV and ESV were not statistically significant among the PET-based methods but were significant between the cardiac MRI and all PET-based methods, with consistent percentage differences ranging from -37.64% to -39.38% for EDV and -43.68% to -45.32% for ESV. Intraclass correlation coefficients showed moderate to good reliability, and Pearson correlation coefficients indicated good to strong correlations between cardiac MRI and PET/MRI and among PET-based methods. Conclusion: PET-based methods produced comparable LVEF measurements to those obtained by cardiac MRI. The use of PET-based methods to evaluate LVEF may offer advantages in terms of convenience and accessibility in this population.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...

![Quantification of Atherosclerotic Plaque Activity and Vascular Inflammation using [18-F] Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography FDG-PET/CT](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F3777.jpg&w=3840&q=50)