Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Precision Ultrasound-guided Stem Cell Delivery for Vascular Repair in Aortic Diseases
Published on: June 20, 2025
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection and vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a systematic review and case series
Neeti Ghali1,2, Chloe Angwin3,4, Samuel Liebert3
1National EDS Service London, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, London, UK. n.ghali@imperial.ac.uk.
Insights
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) in vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS) patients presents with subtle differences, making clinical distinction difficult. Genetic testing is crucial for diagnosing vEDS in SCAD patients for appropriate management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Genetics
- Vascular Biology
Background:
- Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a significant cause of myocardial infarction, particularly in women.
- A subset of SCAD cases are linked to heritable connective tissue disorders, including vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS).
- Vascular EDS, caused by COL3A1 variants, is a common heritable connective tissue disorder associated with SCAD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify specific features of SCAD in vEDS to aid genetic testing selection.
- To compare angiographic and clinical characteristics of SCAD in vEDS patients versus non-vEDS SCAD patients.
- To evaluate the utility of clinical assessment in distinguishing SCAD-vEDS from general SCAD.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of published SCAD and vEDS cases.
- Identification of SCAD-vEDS patients through UK national EDS service and SCAD registry.
- Case-control study comparing SCAD-vEDS patients with age/sex-matched SCAD-nonvEDS controls using exome sequencing and angiography.
Main Results:
- Ten SCAD-vEDS patients were identified from registries, with a lower average age and higher proportion of males compared to SCAD-nonvEDS, though cohort size limits interpretation.
- Systematic review identified 56 SCAD-vEDS cases, with systemic features present in most.
- Clinical differences between SCAD-vEDS and SCAD-nonvEDS groups were insufficient for accurate distinction.
Conclusions:
- Clinical assessment alone is inadequate for identifying all individuals with SCAD who have underlying vEDS.
- All SCAD patients warrant evaluation for vEDS.
- Wider genetic testing may be necessary for SCAD patients to ensure appropriate management and diagnosis of vEDS.
Abstract:
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a cause of acute myocardial infarction predominantly affecting adult women. A proportion of SCAD cases are associated with rare heritable connective tissue disorders. Vascular EDS (vEDS), due to deleterious variants in COL3A1, is one of the most common of these. Our aim was to identify specific features of SCAD in vEDS which may aid patient selection for genetic testing. A systematic review of published cases of individuals with SCAD and vEDS was conducted. Additionally, patients with SCAD and genetically confirmed vEDS (SCAD-vEDS) were identified through the UK national EDS service and UK SCAD registry. Data were collected on presentation, management and extra-cardiac findings. Angiography was compared with an age and sex-matched, exome sequenced, control cohort with SCAD but without vEDS (SCAD-nonvEDS). Data from ten SCAD-vEDS patients were identified. There was a lower average age of SCAD and higher proportion of males in individuals with SCAD-vEDS, however differences should be interpreted carefully given cohort size. Fifty-six cases of SCAD-vEDS were identified through systematic review. Systemic features were present in most but not all cases. This report presents a new, angiographically characterised case-control cohort along with a systematic review of the current literature. Whilst clinical differences appear between the SCAD-vEDS and SCAD-nonvEDS groups, these are insufficient to accurately distinguish SCAD-vEDS from the general SCAD population. All individuals with SCAD should be evaluated for underlying vEDS but clinical assessment will miss some cases. Wider genetic testing in some SCAD patients may be merited to enable appropriate management. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/536751 Identifier: 536751.
More Related Videos
13:07Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression
Published on: January 15, 2022
07:12Author Spotlight: Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Comprehensive Evaluation of the Abdominal Aorta
Published on: September 8, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Aneurysm I: Introduction
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology