Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026
A Novel Approach to Monitoring Graft Neovascularization in the Human Gingiva
Published on: January 12, 2019
Assessment of Take Up Using Different Bone Grafts In Surgical Periodontal Therapy: A Comparative Study
Sanjay K Sahoo1, Thomas C Kappen2, Samhitha Bandaru3
1Department of Periodontics, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Objective:
To evaluate and compare the efficacy of different bone grafts in surgical periodontal therapy with respect to graft uptake and clinical outcomes.
Methods:
A randomized, controlled clinical study involving three groups treated with autogenous bone grafts, allografts, and synthetic bone substitutes. Clinical parameters such as probing depth, clinical attachment level, and radiographic bone fill were assessed over 6 months.
Results:
Autogenous grafts showed superior graft uptake and significant clinical improvement, while synthetic substitutes provided moderate outcomes with logistical advantages.
Conclusion:
Bone graft selection significantly affects clinical outcomes in periodontal therapy. Autogenous grafts remain the gold standard, while synthetic substitutes are viable alternatives in specific scenarios.
More Related Videos
08:41Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials
Published on: August 13, 2019
13:16Computed Tomography and Optical Imaging of Osteogenesis-angiogenesis Coupling to Assess Integration of Cranial Bone Autografts and Allografts
Published on: December 22, 2015