Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026
Author Spotlight: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Movement Observation in Cerebral Palsy
Published on: August 9, 2024
The effectiveness of telepractice for speech-language pathology intervention with children younger than 12 years: A
Jolijn Vanderauwera1,2, Femke Vanden Bempt1, Wendy D'haenens3
1Psychological Sciences Research Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Insights
Telepractice intervention for children aged 12 and under shows comparable or better results than in-person speech-language pathology services. This remote delivery method is an effective alternative for pediatric care.
Area of Science:
- Speech-language pathology
- Pediatric audiology
- Telehealth research
Background:
- Telepractice is increasingly used by speech-language pathologists and audiologists.
- Evidence on telepractice effectiveness in children is limited.
- This study focuses on children aged 12 years and younger.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of telepractice compared to in-person intervention for children.
- To synthesize existing evidence on pediatric telepractice in speech-language pathology and audiology.
Main Methods:
- Systematic search of eight databases for systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials.
- Inclusion criteria focused on telepractice vs. in-person intervention for children ≤12 years.
- Effect sizes were calculated for 31 outcomes.
Main Results:
- Seven speech-language pathology studies met inclusion criteria; no audiology studies.
- Telepractice intervention demonstrated moderate to high effect sizes.
- Effect sizes for telepractice were equal to or larger than in-person intervention.
Conclusions:
- Telepractice intervention yields outcomes comparable or superior to in-person services in speech-language pathology.
- Findings apply to child and caregiver outcomes, and both child-directed and caregiver-mediated approaches.
- Telepractice is an effective alternative for pediatric speech-language pathology intervention.
Abstract:
BackgroundSince Coronavirus disease 2019, telepractice delivery has become increasingly integrated in the standard practice of speech-language pathologists and audiologists. It is therefore important to synthesize existing knowledge on this intervention modality. However, limited evidence exists regarding its use in children. This meta-analysis evaluated evidence on the effectiveness of telepractice compared to in-person intervention for children aged ≤ 12 years.MethodA systematic search was conducted for systematic reviews, meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials comparing telepractice and in-person intervention for children ≤12 years. Eight databases were searched: PsychINFO, Linguistics and Language Behaviour Abstracts, Education Resources Information Centre, Web of Sciences, PubMed, Embase, the Joanna Briggs Institute database, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature.ResultsSeven studies on speech-language pathology intervention met the inclusion criteria; no audiology studies could be included. Effect sizes were calculated for 31 outcomes reported across both conditions (telepractice and in-person intervention). Eight effect sizes were inverted, allowing all positive values to indicate favourable intervention outcomes. Overall, interventions resulted in moderate to high effects, with telepractice intervention resulting in equal or larger effect sizes compared to in-person intervention.ConclusionTelepractice intervention demonstrated outcomes comparable or better than in-person intervention across speech-language pathology subdomains. This applies to both child-related and caregiver-related outcomes, as well as for child-directed (typically for children ≥ 4 years) and caregiver-mediated approaches, where caregivers are trained to implement the strategies at home with their child. These findings suggest that telepractice intervention is an effective alternative to in-person intervention.
