Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes02:49

Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes

26.6K
The free energy change for a reaction that occurs under the standard conditions of 1 bar pressure and at 298 K is called the standard free energy change. Since free energy is a state function, its value depends only on the conditions of the initial and final states of the system. A convenient and common approach to the calculation of free energy changes for physical and chemical reactions is by use of widely available compilations of standard state thermodynamic data. One method involves the...
26.6K
Gauss's Law01:07

Gauss's Law

10.2K
If a closed surface does not have any charge inside where an electric field line can terminate, then the electric field line entering the surface at one point must necessarily exit at some other point of the surface. Therefore, if a closed surface does not have any charges inside the enclosed volume, then the electric flux through the surface is zero. What happens to the electric flux if there are some charges inside the enclosed volume? Gauss's law gives a quantitative answer to this question.
10.2K
Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution: Problem Solving01:20

Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution: Problem Solving

3.1K
Individual molecules in a gas move in random directions, but a gas containing numerous molecules has a predictable distribution of molecular speeds, which is known as the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, f(v).
This distribution function f(v) is defined by saying that the expected number N (v1,v2) of particles with speeds between v1 and v2 is given by
3.1K
Free Energy and Equilibrium00:55

Free Energy and Equilibrium

9.7K
The free energy change for a process may be viewed as a measure of its driving force. A negative value for ΔG represents a driving force for the process in the forward direction, while a positive value represents a driving force for the process in the reverse direction. When ΔG is zero, the forward and reverse driving forces are equal, and the process occurs in both directions at the same rate (the system is at equilibrium).
The reaction quotient, Q, is a convenient measure of the...
9.7K
Free Energy and Equilibrium02:56

Free Energy and Equilibrium

27.8K
The free energy change for a process may be viewed as a measure of its driving force. A negative value for ΔG represents a driving force for the process in the forward direction, while a positive value represents a driving force for the process in the reverse direction. When ΔGrxn is zero, the forward and reverse driving forces are equal, and the process occurs in both directions at the same rate (the system is at equilibrium).
Recall that Q is the numerical value of the mass action...
27.8K
Equilibrium Conditions for a Particle01:23

Equilibrium Conditions for a Particle

2.4K
When an object is in equilibrium, it is either at rest or moving with a constant velocity. There are two types of equilibrium: static and dynamic. Static equilibrium occurs when an object is at rest, while dynamic equilibrium occurs when an object is moving with a constant velocity. In both cases, there must be a balance of forces acting on the object.
To understand the concept of equilibrium, let us first consider the forces acting on an object. When different forces act on an object, they can...
2.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ab Initio Polariton Spectra of ZnTPP Molecules Collectively Coupled Inside an Optical Cavity.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

A Computational Modeling of ADLumin Chemiluminescence: Oxygenation and Dioxetanone Formation.

Journal of computational chemistry·2026
Same author

Nitric Oxide Insertion into a Metalloporphyrin-Carbon Bond.

JACS Au·2026
Same author

Towards a theoretical understanding of excitonic properties of phthalocyanine thin films. I. Low-temperature exciton absorption spectra.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same author

Enhancing Permeability Prediction of Heterobifunctional Degraders Using Machine Learning and Metadynamics-Informed 3D Molecular Descriptors.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025
Same author

An extremely efficient algorithm for (2,2) dynamically weighted constrained complete active space calculations.

The Journal of chemical physics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Isotopic Effect in Double Proton Transfer Process of Porphycene Investigated by Enhanced QM/MM Method
05:51

Isotopic Effect in Double Proton Transfer Process of Porphycene Investigated by Enhanced QM/MM Method

Published on: July 19, 2019

6.7K

Enhancing Gaussian process regression-accelerated QM/MM free energy simulations using atomic environment descriptors.

Ryan Snyder1, Dongru Li1, Tinh Ho1

  • 1Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Indiana University Indianapolis, 402 N. Blackford St., Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA.

The Journal of Chemical Physics
|March 18, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed a machine learning approach to accelerate accurate free energy simulations using combined quantum and molecular mechanics (QM/MM). This method achieves high accuracy at significantly reduced computational cost, enabling faster reaction mechanism studies.

More Related Videos

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.8K
Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package
06:37

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package

Published on: September 17, 2021

5.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Isotopic Effect in Double Proton Transfer Process of Porphycene Investigated by Enhanced QM/MM Method
05:51

Isotopic Effect in Double Proton Transfer Process of Porphycene Investigated by Enhanced QM/MM Method

Published on: July 19, 2019

6.7K
Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.8K
Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package
06:37

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package

Published on: September 17, 2021

5.2K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Chemistry
  • Molecular Dynamics
  • Machine Learning in Chemistry

Background:

  • Accurate free energy simulations are crucial for understanding chemical reactions in complex systems.
  • Achieving ab initio QM/MM accuracy with affordable semiempirical QM/MM methods for efficient sampling is a significant challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend a Δ-machine learning approach using Gaussian process regression (GPR) for enhanced QM/MM simulations.
  • To incorporate atomic environment descriptors and MM-solvent contributions into GPR models for improved accuracy and efficiency.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized atom-centered symmetry functions for atomic environment descriptors.
  • Employed a system-specific sum kernel for molecular similarity inference.
  • Trained energy-only GPR and GPR with derivative observation (GPRwDO) schemes.
  • Integrated models into CHARMM simulations via a GPflow/pyCHARMM interface.

Main Results:

  • Reduced AM1/MM potential energy errors from ~13.1 to 1.4 (energy-only GPR) and 2.2 (GPRwDO) kcal/mol.
  • Decreased force errors from ~14.6 to 4.4 and 2.1 (kcal/mol)/Å.
  • Achieved ~100-fold acceleration with AM1-GPR(wDO)/MM reaching target accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • The developed GPR-based QM/MM methods significantly improve energetics and force description accuracy.
  • Models provide excellent agreement with high-level benchmarks for free energy barriers and reaction energies.
  • This approach enables efficient and accurate free energy simulations for complex chemical systems.