Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Left Atrial Appendage Closure or Medical Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation
Ulf Landmesser1,2,3, Carsten Skurk1,2, Paulus Kirchhof4,5,6
1Department of Cardiology, Angiology, and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin.
Insights
Left atrial appendage closure did not prove noninferior to best medical care for preventing stroke and bleeding events in high-risk atrial fibrillation patients. This finding suggests current medical management remains the standard for these complex cases.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Catheter-based left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is an alternative to oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF).
- Effectiveness of LAA closure versus physician-directed best medical care in high-risk AF patients for stroke and bleeding is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the noninferiority of LAA closure versus best medical care in patients with AF at high risk for stroke and bleeding.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter randomized trial in Germany assigned high-risk AF patients to LAA closure or physician-directed best medical care.
- The primary endpoint was a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, or death, assessed via time-to-event analysis with a noninferiority margin of hazard ratio 1.3.
Main Results:
- The study included 912 patients (mean age 77.9 years; mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 5.2; mean HAS-BLED score 3.0).
- After 3 years median follow-up, the primary endpoint occurred in 16.8% of the LAA closure group and 13.3% of the medical therapy group (P=0.44 for noninferiority).
- Serious adverse events were reported in 82.5% of the device group and 77.4% of the medical therapy group.
Conclusions:
- Left atrial appendage closure was not noninferior to physician-directed best medical care in high-risk AF patients.
- The composite endpoint of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, or death was not significantly reduced by LAA closure compared to best medical care.
Background:
Catheter-based closure of the left atrial appendage is an alternative to oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. The effectiveness of this strategy, as compared with physician-directed best medical care, in patients at high risk for stroke and bleeding is unknown.
Methods:
In this multicenter randomized trial conducted in Germany, we assigned patients with atrial fibrillation and a high risk of stroke and bleeding to undergo left atrial appendage closure or to receive physician-directed best medical care (including direct oral anticoagulants, if eligible). The primary end point, tested for noninferiority, was a composite of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), systemic embolism, major bleeding, or cardiovascular or unexplained death, assessed in a time-to-event analysis. The noninferiority margin was a hazard ratio of 1.3.
Results:
A total of 912 adult patients underwent randomization. The primary end-point analysis included 446 patients who were assigned to undergo left atrial appendage closure (device group) and 442 who were assigned to physician-directed best medical care (medical-therapy group). The mean (±SD) age was 77.9±7.1 years; 38.6% of the patients were women, the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 5.2±1.5 (range, 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of stroke), and the mean HAS-BLED score was 3.0±0.9 (range, 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating higher risk of bleeding). After a median follow-up of 3 years (interquartile range, 1.7 to 4.7), a first primary end-point event had occurred in 155 patients (incidence per 100 patient-years, 16.8) in the device group and in 127 patients (incidence per 100 patient-years, 13.3) in the medical-therapy group (difference in restricted mean survival time, -0.36 years; 95% confidence interval, -0.70 to -0.01; P = 0.44 for noninferiority). Serious adverse events occurred in 368 patients (82.5%) in the device group and 342 (77.4%) in the medical-therapy group.
Conclusions:
Among patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk for stroke and bleeding, left atrial appendage closure was not noninferior to physician-directed best medical care with regard to a composite end point of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, or cardiovascular or unexplained death. (Funded by the German Center for Cardiovascular Research; CLOSURE-AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03463317.).
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care

