Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

An Efficient Single—Person Technique for Milk Sampling from Laboratory Mice
Published on: March 28, 2025
Prediction of welfare scores throughout lactation by random regression test-day models in Walloon Holstein dairy cows
1TERRA Teaching and Research Center, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium.
Abstract:
As concern for animal welfare grows, the challenge of carrying out individual assessments on a large scale remains unresolved. This study aimed to investigate the potential of random regression test-day models (RR-TDM) to predict individual welfare scores of dairy cows throughout the entire lactation, using routinely collected milk yield and composition records. A total of 2,381 cows from 30 herds in the Walloon Region of Belgium were assessed between 2019 and 2024. The protocol used in this study focused on 4 key principles: proper feeding, suitable housing, good health, and appropriate behavior. An initial welfare assessment was conducted on all cows to calculate the Score Global Individuel de bien-être (SGI-I), a composite welfare score based specifically on feeding, housing, and health criteria. Subsequently, a more comprehensive evaluation (SGI-II), which also incorporated behavioral assessments, was performed on a subset of 1,229 cows. The data consisted of test-day records of milk yield (MY), fat percentage (FP), protein percentage (PP), SCS, SGI-I, and SGI-II. To evaluate the potential of a multiple-trait RR-TDM to predict SGI, a five-fold cross-validation procedure was performed. For each trait (SGI-I and SGI-II), the dataset was partitioned into a training set (75%) and a validation set (25%) where the SGI were masked. (Co)variance components were then estimated using the combined data from both the training and validation sets; then, SGI solutions were predicted for all animals in the population, using MY, FP, PP, and SCS as predictors. This entire process of partitioning, masking, estimation, and prediction was repeated 5 times for SGI-I and 5 times for SGI-II to ensure the stability and robustness of the predictions. Prediction accuracy was evaluated using Pearson's correlation, root mean squared error (RMSE), prediction error, absolute prediction error, and Cohen's kappa. The mean (SD) SGI-I and SGI-II were 69.92 (10.28) and 65.90 (9.65), respectively. The mean Pearson correlation between predicted and observed scores was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.73-0.80) for SGI-I and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.66-0.77) for SGI-II. Cohen's kappa values indicated substantial agreement, with κ = 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71-0.79) for SGI-I and κ = 0.72 (95% CI: 0.66-0.78) for SGI-II. The mean R2 was 0.58 (RMSE = 6.66) for SGI-I and 0.51 (RMSE = 7.23) for SGI-II. These findings demonstrate the potential of RR-TDM to predict SGI for the entire lactation using available test-day records of milk yield and composition in Holstein dairy cows.
Related Concept Videos
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I
The test works...
Residuals and Least-Squares Property
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
Multiple Regression
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
Regression Toward the Mean
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...

