Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026
Manipulation of Rhythmic Food Intake in Mice Using a Custom-Made Feeding System
Published on: December 16, 2022
Relative Effects of Time-Restricted Eating, Energy-Restricted Eating, and Unrestricted Eating on Eating Patterns and
Lisa J Harnack1, Niki Oldenburg2, Qi Wang3
1Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 1300 South 2(nd) Street Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55454.
Background:
Time-restricted eating (TRE) may be as effective as an energy-restricted (ER) diet for weight loss. However, little is known about the effects of TRE on eating patterns and dietary intake.
Objective:
The aims of this study were to examine the relative effects of TRE, ER, and unrestricted eating (UE) diets on eating patterns and dietary intake.
Design:
This study is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial carried out between October 2020 and October 2023. Over this period, 88 participants were randomized to a TRE, ER, or UE diet group.
Participants/Setting:
Adults with obesity in the Minneapolis-Saint Paul, Minnesota, metropolitan area who completed study baseline and follow-up measures of dietary intake (n = 73).
Intervention:
The interventions were (1) TRE with an 8-hour self-chosen window with ad libitum diet; (2) ER diet with 15% reduction of energy intake; or (3) UE in which self-monitoring of food intake was encouraged with no specific change to eating recommended. The intervention period was 12 weeks.
Main Outcome Measures:
Outcomes included meals eaten and intake of vegetables, fruit, dairy, protein foods, grains, energy, added sugars, saturated fat, sodium, dietary fiber, and potassium.
Statistical Analyses:
Multivariate linear regression analyses were carried out to compare the change in food and nutrient intake between experimental groups. Logistic mixed-effects models were constructed to examine the change in meals eaten.
Results:
The TRE group ate fewer daily meals at end-intervention (-1.1 meals/day; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.6, -0.7) compared with baseline, whereas the ER and UE groups did not experience a change in eating occasions. Those in the TRE group were less likely to report eating breakfast during end-intervention compared with baseline (odds ratio [OR], 0.13; 95% CI, 0.05, 0.33), whereas no statistically significant change in behavior was identified for the ER (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.41, 2.55) or UE (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.28, 1.68) groups. Between baseline and end-intervention those in the TRE group had a decrease in intake of energy (-469 kcal/day; 95% CI, -681, -257), saturated fat (-8.5 g/day; 95% CI, -12.9, -4.1), potassium (-496 mg/day; 95% CI, -729, -263), and total (-1.7 ounce equivalents/day; 95% CI, -2.9, -0.6) and refined grains (-1.6 ounce equivalents; 95% CI, -2.6, -0.6). These changes were more marked compared with changes in the UE group. There were no statistically significant differences found between those in the TRE and ER groups.
Conclusions:
Findings suggest that TRE with an 8-hour window and ad libitum intake may have similar effects on food and nutrient intake as an energy-restricted diet.
Related Concept Videos
01:23Binge Eating Disorders
01:30Regulation of Food Intake
01:19Energy Balance
01:24Metabolic States of the Body: Fasting and Starvation
01:29Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
01:18Metabolic States of the Body: The Postabsorptive State
Initially, glycogen stored in the liver is broken down to release glucose into the bloodstream, while glycogen in the muscles is broken down to supply glucose for energy directly within the muscle cells. As glycogen stores diminish,...