Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Neuroimaging-Guided TMS–EEG for Real-Time Cortical Network Mapping
Published on: June 13, 2025
Visualization of the Trochlear Nerve Using Deep Learning-enhanced 3D T2-weighted MR Imaging at 3T
Taiki Koshiishi1, Satoru Ide2, Yuka Ishimoto1
1Department of Radiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki Aomori, Japan.
Purpose:
Cranial nerve imaging with 3T MRI commonly uses 3D fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (3D-FIESTA); however, this sequence has limitations in achieving higher spatial resolution and provides poor tissue contrast between cranial nerves and adjacent vascular structures. We evaluated 3D T2-weighted imaging (T2-CUBE) with deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) for cranial nerve visualization, focusing on the trochlear nerve, the smallest cranial nerve with the longest intracranial course, and compared it with T2-CUBE without DLR and 3D-FIESTA.
Methods:
Ten healthy male volunteers (age, 23-40 years; mean age, 32 years) underwent T2-CUBE with and without DLR, and 3D-FIESTA at 3T. Two neuroradiologists independently evaluated trochlear nerve visualization in 4 anatomical segments (origin from the midbrain, cisternal, tentorial, and anterior portion of its cavernous segments) using a 3-point scale, and SNR of the pons (SNRPONS) and cerebrospinal fluid (SNRCSF) were calculated.
Results:
T2-CUBE with DLR achieved a 100% visualization across all trochlear nerve segments and demonstrated significantly better visualization than both T2-CUBE without DLR and 3D-FIESTA (P < 0.025). T2-CUBE without DLR showed 67.5%-100% visualization across the 4 segments. 3D-FIESTA showed 32.5%-80% visualization of the origin from the midbrain, cisternal, and tentorial segments, with no visualization of the cavernous segments. DLR increased SNRPONS and SNRCSF by factors of 1.8-2.5 (SNRPONS: 14.1 vs 5.7; SNRCSF: 31.8 vs 17.5, respectively; P < 0.001). T2-CUBE with DLR demonstrated significantly higher SNRPONS than 3D-FIESTA (14.1 vs 6.4, P < 0.001), while SNRCSF was comparable (31.8 vs 36.3, P = 0.20).
Conclusion:
T2-CUBE with DLR at 3T provided a significantly better trochlear nerve visualization than T2-CUBE without DLR and 3D-FIESTA. This technique may extend beyond the trochlear nerve to other cranial nerves and to the evaluation of neurovascular compression in the cistern, with the potential to become the new standard for cisternal imaging.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...

