Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

09:40
An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
15.4K
Linear Magnetic Compression Gastroileostomy Bipartition: Feasibility and Early Outcomes
Michel Gagner1, Lamees Almutlaq1, Rui Ribeiro2
1From the Department of Surgery, Westmount Square Surgical Center, Westmount, QC, Canada (Gagner, Almutlaq, Gnanhoue, Vally-Adam).
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
|March 19, 2026
Summary
The magnetic gastroileostomy bipartition (MagGI) procedure is a feasible revisional option for sleeve gastrectomy, showing significant excess weight loss and high patient satisfaction. Further studies are needed to confirm long-term safety and efficacy.
Area of Science:
- Bariatric Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Procedures
- Gastroenterology
Background:
- Minimally invasive magnetic compression anastomosis techniques offer potential advantages over traditional methods.
- These techniques may simplify surgical procedures and reduce complications associated with staple/suture fixation and enterotomy closures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility and preliminary outcomes of the magnetic gastroileostomy bipartition (MagGI) procedure.
- To assess MagGI as a revisional option for patients with suboptimal sleeve gastrectomy (SG).
Main Methods:
- A multi-site study involving adults with a BMI of 30.0-50.0 kg/m2 undergoing revisional MagGI after SG.
- Magnets were endoscopically and laparoscopically placed in the ileum and gastric antrum, then approximated to create a compression anastomosis.
- Primary endpoints included successful magnet placement, passage without reintervention, and patent anastomosis creation within 90 days.
Main Results:
- The study met its primary feasibility endpoint with 100% magnet placement and patent anastomosis in 20 patients.
- Significant excess weight loss was observed: 57.5% at 6 months and 66.0% at 12 months.
- Most adverse events were low-grade; no anastomotic leaks, bleeding, or mortality were reported.
Conclusions:
- The SG-revisional MagGI procedure demonstrates technical feasibility and promising short-term weight loss results.
- High patient satisfaction suggests potential for this technique.
- Longer-term follow-up in larger patient cohorts is necessary to fully establish safety and efficacy.

