Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
AI-Assisted Systematic Review: Humans Still Need to Review All Abstracts for Inclusion
Hyelin Sung1, Deyana Altahsh1, Scott Garrison2
1Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Unlabelled:
Although a general purpose (GPT-5), and a fine-tuned (ASReviewLab) artificial intelligence were able to rank abstracts for likely inclusion in a variety of Cochrane systematic reviews, some actually included studies were not highly ranked, necessitating human review of all abstracts.
More Related Videos
05:47Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
08:36Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
The Scientific Method
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...