Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

12.1K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
12.1K
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

8.8K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.8K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.3K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

520
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
520
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

274.7K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
274.7K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

13.8K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interaction Between Chronotype and the Timing of Antihypertensive Medication on Cardiovascular Events and Death.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2025
Same author

Opioid agonist therapy for opioid use disorder in primary versus specialty care.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2025
Same author

Empowering refugee voices: Using Nominal Group Technique (NGT) with a diverse refugee Patient Advisory Committee (PAC) to identify health and research priorities in Calgary, Canada.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Antihypertensive deprescribing in frail long-term care residents (OptimizeBP): protocol for a prospective, randomised, open-label pragmatic trial.

BMJ open·2024
Same author

Bedtime versus morning use of antihypertensives in frail continuing care residents (BedMed-Frail): protocol for a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded end-point pragmatic trial.

BMJ open·2023
Same author

Tolerability of bedtime diuretics: a prospective cohort analysis.

BMJ open·2023
Same journal

Remote Assessment of Parkinson Disease Using Deep Learning on Structured Mouse-Trace Data From Suspected Cases: Machine-Learning Pilot Feasibility Study.

JMIR formative research·2026
Same journal

Perspectives on Continuous Glucose Monitoring Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes in the United Kingdom: Cross-Sectional Survey.

JMIR formative research·2026
Same journal

Real-World Engagement With a Generative AI Conversational Agent for Mental Health Support: Retrospective Descriptive Study.

JMIR formative research·2026
Same journal

Improving Models to Predict Care Utilization Using Machine Learning: Retrospective Observational Study.

JMIR formative research·2026
Same journal

Implementing a Commercial AI Fracture Detection Tool in Health Care Using the Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability Framework: A Formative Evaluation Study.

JMIR formative research·2026
Same journal

An Evaluation of the Usability and Feasibility of the 50K4Life Mobile App for Delivering Walking Challenges to Public School Administrative Employees: Beta Testing Study.

JMIR formative research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

34.3K

AI-Assisted Systematic Review: Humans Still Need to Review All Abstracts for Inclusion.

Hyelin Sung1, Deyana Altahsh1, Scott Garrison2

  • 1Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

JMIR Formative Research
|March 19, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools like GPT-5 and ASReviewLab can rank abstracts for systematic reviews. However, some relevant studies were missed, requiring continued human oversight in the abstract screening process.

Keywords:
AIASReviewLabChatGPTGPT-5LLMartificial intelligencelarge language modelmachine learningsystematic reviewtitle and abstract screening

More Related Videos

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.8K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

34.3K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.8K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Information Science
  • Medical Informatics
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Systematic reviews require extensive abstract screening.
  • Artificial intelligence (AI) offers potential for automating this process.
  • Evaluating AI tools for abstract screening accuracy is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the performance of a general-purpose AI (GPT-5) and a fine-tuned AI (ASReviewLab) in ranking abstracts for Cochrane systematic reviews.
  • To determine if AI can reliably identify all relevant studies for inclusion.

Main Methods:

  • Two AI models, GPT-5 and ASReviewLab, were applied to rank abstracts.
  • The ranking performance was evaluated against the actual inclusion status in Cochrane systematic reviews.

Main Results:

  • Both GPT-5 and ASReviewLab demonstrated capability in ranking abstracts for systematic reviews.
  • However, some studies that were ultimately included in reviews received suboptimal rankings from the AI models.

Conclusions:

  • While AI shows promise in abstract screening for systematic reviews, it is not yet a complete replacement for human review.
  • Human oversight remains essential to ensure all relevant studies are identified and included.