Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
'There is no need to worry': How general practitioners integrate patient concerns into the shared decision-making
Désanne Noordam1, Janneke Noordman2, Tim Olde Hartman3
1Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, Netherlands; Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Objectives:
Many models, measures and theories on shared decision-making (SDM) stress the importance of addressing patient concerns. Yet, limited research is available on how concerns are integrated in and shape the SDM dialogue between patients and clinicians. This study provides insights into how the SDM dialogue unfolds when patients express concerns.
Methods:
Data consisted of 181 video-recorded Dutch GP-patient encounters. The VR-CoDES was used to identify patient concerns and as an inspiration to categorize GP strategies for integrating concerns in the SDM dialogue. The OPTION 5 was used to identify the SDM dialogue and calculate the extent to which GPs applied SDM. A two-tailed t-test was used to test differences in SDM application in encounters with versus without concerns.
Results:
Patients expressed concerns about their health complaint and about treatment. The former was often combined with or formulated as a treatment request and the latter as rejection of a certain treatment. GPs addressed and integrated both types of patient concerns into the SDM dialogue through various strategies: they provided tailored information, offered explicit reassurance, shared their professional opinion, focused on picking treatment, gave patients decisional control and they explored concerns. In several cases, patients became open to reconsider the treatment they initially requested or rejected. Seen on a 100-point scale, GPs' SDM application was higher in encounters with (M = 36.3) versus without concerns (M = 31.1). This difference tested significant (t(18) = 2.52, p < 0.05), though with a small effect size (d = 0.23).
Conclusion:
Clinicians used various strategies to integrate patient concerns into the SDM dialogue. Patients often expressed concerns in the form of a treatment rejection or request.
Implications:
These findings suggest that through integrating patient concerns into the SDM dialogue, patients can become more open to (re)consider and discuss feasible treatment options.
More Related Videos
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
01:30Ethical Dilemmas II
01:13Patient-centered Care
01:27Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
01:27Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
01:27Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
01:18Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II
Physical Therapist
A physical therapist (PT) aims to restore function or prevent additional impairment in a patient following an injury or disease. Massage, heat, cold, water, sonar waves, exercises, and electrical stimulation are some treatments used by PTs to treat...